Aviso: Esta página no se ha traducido todavía. Lo que está viendo es la versión original de la página. Por favor, consulte esta página para informarse de cómo puede ayudar con las traducciones y hacer otras contribuciones.
Meanwhile, the EUCD has been implemented in all EU member countries. These pages are kept for archiving purposes.
EUCD - Copyright extensions that harm
In December 1996 in Geneve the WIPO Copyright Treaty was signed by most, if not all, developed countries. By signing this treaty these countries compromised themselves to give away the right to use a copyrighted work in favour of protection of electronic protections, independently of their effectiveness.
Today we are starting to see the effects of this kind of legislation. The U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the European Union Copyright Directive (EUCD) pass the WIPO treaty into effective law. This page is about the effects of this kind of legislation and related resources.
The risks of this kind of legislation are:
- Monopolies on file formats - This is the issue that is worrying libraries. The ability to effectively control a file format means that each e-book format will have its own reader and it will only be readable by that company's reader. Maintaining access to all the different kinds of readers throughout decades needs the kind of personnel and technological ability that libraries can't afford right now, not to mention the cost of e-book readers that they'll need to have to give access to the library's users.
- Interoperability - If you can't use and share tools to analyze protocols, because they can be used to circumvent ineffective technological measures, then it's not possible to put two systems working together unless both vendors publish information on the protocols they use. Knowing the trend of proprietary software vendors to trap a client in its systems, this is not a realistic scenario.
- Insecurity - In the last years the full disclosure movement has made considerable improvements on the whole security of computer systems. This was done by forcing vendors to correct the vulnerabilities through the publishing of vulnerabilities even if they weren't corrected in a limited timeframe. To avoid an image problem most vendors started correcting in days what used to take months or even years to do. With this legislation a vulnerability that allows the circumvention of rights-management information cannot be even communicated. This means that full disclosure is not an option, and that we all lose its advantages.
The pieces of legislation that follow the letter of the WIPO Copyright Treaty are:
- Digital Millennium Copyrigth Act (USA)
- European Union Copyright Directive (EU)
- Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (AU)
This legislation as already been analyzed by law professors, experts and others. Following is a sample of those analysis:
Organisations against Copyright Extensions
Some organisations have understood the impact of this kind of legislation and have made statements about it:
- Association for Computer Machinery
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- EBLIDA Comments on Copyright Directive - European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Associations, The European Consumers' Association, European Association of Consumer Electronics Manufacturers, European Blind Union, European Disability Forum, International League of Societies for Persons with Mental Handicap - European Association