This page has not been translated yet. Please help us to translate this and other pages on fsfe.org, so people can read our message in their native language.

News

And the winner of the election for FSFE's Fellowship GA seat is…

on:

Election results

It has been an interesting time since FSFE added a Fellowship representation to the General Assembly (GA). Torsten Grote, Jan-Hendrik Peters, Michel Roche, and Björn Schießle emerged from the candidacy period, as the first four Fellows running for the election.

They set up their election websites, blogged about their activities, and also participated to a two hour “meet the candidates” jabber meeting. During the meeting other Fellows had the chance to get to know them, to ask them about their visions on the Fellowship programme and their potential role in FSFE's GA.

Today at midnight the one month election period ended, and here are the results:

  1. Torsten Grote, condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices
  2. Björn Schießle, loses to Torsten Grote by 79–52
  3. Jan-Hendrik Peters, loses to Torsten Grote by 84–46, loses to Björn Schießle by 70–65
  4. Michel Roche, loses to Torsten Grote by 86–49, loses to Jan-Hendrik Peters by 65–62

Thanks to all Fellows who participated in the whole process and made this a valuable experience for the Fellowship and for FSFE. In particular, thanks to Björn, Jan-Hendrik and Michel for running as candidates and for their efforts during the campaign. Last but not least, congratulations to Torsten!

FSFE is looking forward to meeting you at the next General Assembly on 20 June in Miraflores de la Sierra, Spain.

Result details

1.2.3.4.
1.Torsten Grote798486
2.Björn Schießle527073
3.Jan-Hendrik Peters466565
4.Michel Roche496062

Ballot report

Torsten GroteJan-Hendrik PetersMichel RocheBjörn Schießle
2132
1432
4122
2134
1324
1432
1432
4321
2no opinionno opinion1
2211
3421
2344
2341
2211
1324
2221
4441
4444
1243
2134
no opinion1no opinion4
2341
1243
2341
2132
4413
1423
2122
no opinionno opinionno opinion1
1342
2143
2213
no opinionno opinion12
2212
1342
1324
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
3412
3414
1234
2144
1243
2143
3331
4413
1423
3241
2213
3412
1243
2314
4441
4132
1221
1432
12no opinionno opinion
2314
1324
4321
4144
1432
3341
2331
1342
2323
2221
2134
2214
3241
1234
4223
3311
2331
2212
1423
1342
4123
4124
1222
no opinionno opinion14
3214
2241
1342
3421
1243
12no opinion3
2143
12no opinionno opinion
4142
1442
1423
2341
3343
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
3113
1412
2343
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
3421
3214
3312
1432
1243
1342
no opinion1no opinion2
2341
4321
4444
1231
2441
3213
3412
1111
2134
1243
2331
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
4312
1444
2212
no opinionno opinion1no opinion
1424
3241
3214
1243
1222
no opinion21no opinion
1221
1234
1243
3431
3124
1442
1243
no opinionno opinion4no opinion
2133
2133
3412
2313
3421
3241
2212
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
3241
2133
3421
no opinion213
2no opinion13
12no opinionno opinion
2143
4123
3241
1444
no opinion2no opinion1
3214
1241
1432
1344
1324
4213
4213
2134
21no opinion3
no opinionno opinionno opinion1
21no opinionno opinion
1423
2313
no opinionno opinionno opinionno opinion
12no opinionno opinion
1221
1342
1234
4414
4132

Ballots are shown in a randomly generated order.

You can download ballots as a CSV.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

1.2.3.4.
1.Torsten Grote-79–5284–4686–49
2.Björn Schießle.-70–6573–60
3.Jan-Hendrik Peters..-65–62
4.Michel Roche...-