"DMA's interoperability is against fundamental rights" claims Apple. The FSFE disagrees. If you also think interoperability is key for software freedom, support us!

Transcript of SFP#19: Why we need Free Software on medical devices with Karen Sandler

Back to the episode SFP#19

This is a transcript created with the Free Software tool Whisper. For more information and feedback reach out to podcast@fsfe.org

WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:19.440
Welcome to the Software Freedom Podcast. This podcast is presented to you by the free

00:19.440 --> 00:24.760
Software Foundation Europe. We are a charity that empowers users to control technology.

00:24.760 --> 00:29.960
I'm Bonnie Merring and our guest for today's episode is Karen Sandler. Karen is an attorney

00:30.280 --> 00:36.520
and the executive director of the NGO Software Freedom Conservancy. Karen has also

00:36.520 --> 00:41.720
a very personal relationship with her software as she is depending on a medical device connected

00:41.720 --> 00:47.720
to her heart, which is called a filibrator. This helps her to keep working and is also a

00:47.720 --> 00:53.000
livesaving device for her. But this device, like many medical devices, is thrown by known

00:53.000 --> 00:58.920
free software. So it's unknown how it works and Karen has no control of it. Today, Karen will

00:58.920 --> 01:03.560
talk with us about how this changed her relationship with software and also the problems that

01:03.560 --> 01:09.400
occur with medical devices. Welcome to the Software Freedom Podcast, Karen. And I'm really

01:09.400 --> 01:15.080
glad that we have this opportunity to talk about your love for free software. Thank you so much.

01:15.080 --> 01:22.360
I am so excited to talk to you. We are actually in person, which is just so exciting and different

01:22.440 --> 01:28.920
and wonderful at Phosdom. That's true. I haven't been at an impersonal event for ages, I think.

01:29.480 --> 01:35.000
It's just, yeah, this is one of the first things that I've been to. Certainly my first trip

01:36.040 --> 01:44.920
transatlantic since COVID. And the last Phosdom in 2020 was basically like the last big event.

01:44.920 --> 01:51.080
So it's very exciting that it's happening again. And how does it feel to be back here at Phosdom

01:51.080 --> 01:58.200
now in person after two years of break? It is, you know, it's mixed. I'm very, I'm a little nervous.

01:59.400 --> 02:05.480
I don't know if keen listeners can hear, but I am wearing a mask. You know, some things are

02:05.480 --> 02:10.520
really different than they were before. I have a her condition I was born with. And so I have to be

02:10.520 --> 02:17.000
a little bit more careful than most people. So there's that. But it is just the best thing in the

02:17.000 --> 02:24.040
world to be here in the university filled with people who care so much about software freedom.

02:24.040 --> 02:28.520
I mean, we go through our daily lives talking to people about software freedom hoping that they

02:28.520 --> 02:34.120
will understand why this issue is important and like explaining the problems with our technology.

02:34.120 --> 02:39.560
And then to come to a place where there are so many people who already know about this issue and

02:39.560 --> 02:46.840
care about it, it's very overwhelming in the best kind of way. Oh my god. How do you feel about

02:46.840 --> 02:51.400
free software? Like what comes to your mind when you hear it? The term free software.

02:52.200 --> 02:58.760
It's so interesting, you know, I think like I'm so entrenched in the world of free software. And it's

02:58.760 --> 03:06.200
been my life for so long that when I hear the word free software, honestly, by itself, I'm often

03:06.280 --> 03:11.320
reminded of the political differences that we've had over time. And the arguments we've had about

03:11.320 --> 03:18.520
terminology, which I think have divided us. And so I'm particularly excited to be talking to you now

03:18.520 --> 03:25.160
here because it's the software freedom podcast. And I would note that the FSFE booth, there's a

03:25.160 --> 03:31.160
stand that falls down like which are tables. And they're in the like entryway of the university

03:31.160 --> 03:37.240
building. And we have two of the best tables in the entire conference. So when you go in the front

03:37.240 --> 03:43.000
door of the big building where you expect to see the stands, the the software freedom conservancy

03:43.000 --> 03:49.160
and the FSFE booths are right there right next to each other. It's pretty exciting. And so

03:50.840 --> 03:56.520
it depends on the day when I hear the terms free software, software freedom. I think like

03:56.680 --> 04:07.480
it's a cause that I'm so excited about now that I think just, you know, if like the word alone,

04:08.280 --> 04:15.480
especially like thinking of software freedom is just like just still very exciting to me. It's

04:15.480 --> 04:23.080
like full of possibility. How do you feel about it? Oh my god. How do I feel? I feel very empowered

04:23.160 --> 04:30.760
because it gives me the so much opportunities, you know, I can learn by it. And that's the most

04:30.760 --> 04:39.000
amazing thing for me because I love to learn. That's why I can't imagine stop thing to study

04:39.000 --> 04:45.640
anything because I'm like, oh my god. But if I am not able to go to a lecture anymore and

04:46.120 --> 04:53.880
just sit and learn, yeah. So that's intrinsic to the whole free software ecosystem, right? It's

04:53.880 --> 04:58.360
the idea that you don't just take anything for granted. You never get to the point where you know

04:58.360 --> 05:02.920
everything. Our projects are never at the point where they're finished. It's never good enough

05:02.920 --> 05:07.240
because there's always more work that we can do. There's always improvements we can do. And we

05:07.240 --> 05:11.720
always have to ask the questions of like, what don't we know? What can we learn about? What can we

05:11.720 --> 05:19.800
improve? Yeah, that's how I feel about free software. So it can relate to that. Talking about

05:19.800 --> 05:30.360
knowledge and learning and universities, I hear you earn an honorary doctor. How do you feel about

05:30.360 --> 05:39.160
that? Honestly, it's so exciting that it feels like a dream. Like I feel like I'm going to wake up

05:39.240 --> 05:49.800
and it didn't happen. So getting an honorary doctorate is obviously a huge honor no matter

05:49.800 --> 05:55.080
what the circumstances. And the fact that it's connected to the work that I have done on

05:55.080 --> 06:04.040
software freedom, diversity inclusion, and the full extent of things that I have worked on is

06:04.840 --> 06:13.400
super cool, but it like every piece of this kind of like gets cooler because the university

06:13.400 --> 06:22.200
Kai live in, they give five honorary degrees per year. Four of them are nominated by faculty. So

06:23.160 --> 06:29.560
they're often faculty members whose work has been influenced or inspired by someone. And so the

06:29.560 --> 06:37.720
promoter will submit those names and like there's like an academic component to it where, you know,

06:37.720 --> 06:43.720
anyway. So, but the fifth one, which is the one I got, is nominated by the students. And

06:43.720 --> 06:51.000
Kai live in as a huge university. So it's like just this massive honor because the students

06:51.640 --> 06:56.440
surely get, it's like over 60,000 students. So they surely get at least a few recommendations,

06:56.440 --> 07:05.000
the student council and they research them and go through them. And knowing that the thing that

07:05.000 --> 07:11.640
I have been trying to explain to people and advocate for, that a few people have said at least,

07:11.640 --> 07:17.640
you know, we're convinced this is important. It was just massive and more importantly or most

07:17.640 --> 07:23.800
importantly about this whole thing is that students are the people we need to reach the most. I mean,

07:23.800 --> 07:29.560
we need to reach everybody at all levels of society. But if students can understand why software

07:29.560 --> 07:36.040
freedom really matters, like we have a chance to make some really broad sweeping change. And that's

07:36.040 --> 07:42.200
something that we've been working towards for a long time. And I, this is like a really just

07:42.200 --> 07:49.400
wonderful sign that it's possible. So I feel like very invigorated, very inspired and like really

07:49.400 --> 07:54.840
excited to do more work because like some of the students showed up at Bosnum who had been around

07:54.840 --> 08:01.640
for the thing. And the other thing is that they recorded a video about the work and like they

08:01.640 --> 08:08.280
got it all right, you know? Like not only just like they didn't fall into any terminology problems,

08:08.280 --> 08:13.960
which if they did, it wouldn't have been a problem. But not just that, they really understood what

08:13.960 --> 08:20.440
software freedom is, why it matters to them and to the like to society. And they were able to

08:20.440 --> 08:25.880
articulate it probably better than I ever would. This gives me a chill. Like if you talk about it,

08:25.880 --> 08:34.280
I'm feeling very accelerated. I think that would be the word. And yeah, it's just, I'm, yeah.

08:35.080 --> 08:40.920
I feel like a change for that. And it's amazing. Thanks. I really do feel like things have changed.

08:40.920 --> 08:45.480
Like I feel like the last few months, people who are a software freedom conservancy sustainers will

08:45.480 --> 08:49.880
have seen an email that I sent out at the end of the year. And I meant to make it into a blog post,

08:49.880 --> 08:55.240
but it just, it was really suited towards an email. I'll probably try to make it as a blog post

08:55.240 --> 09:01.960
later. But I really think that we've turned a corner. You know, what's happened with Elon Musk

09:01.960 --> 09:08.280
and Twitter is like just the latest in a series of examples of why our technology is vulnerable.

09:08.280 --> 09:14.440
And what can go wrong and why it can be so bad and why we don't want to rely on for-profit companies

09:14.440 --> 09:21.080
is single points of failure for our technology. And so it's amazing because people who don't know

09:21.080 --> 09:25.080
anything about technology are saying, I want to get off Twitter. And then suddenly there actually

09:25.080 --> 09:31.800
is a fedaverse to go to. We were ready. And you know, so many people have just switched over already.

09:31.800 --> 09:36.760
And it just shows what's possible. And I think that's really different than it was a year to five

09:36.760 --> 09:42.920
years ago. I think people understand that their technology is vulnerable. Like when we used to give

09:42.920 --> 09:47.640
talks, we used to have to like go through all of the examples of the ways in which your technology

09:47.640 --> 09:53.560
could be maliciously controlled and blah, blah, blah, blah. And people would say, oh, I didn't know

09:53.560 --> 09:59.160
that, you know, that that could happen. And now people are saying, of course, my phone is surveilling

09:59.160 --> 10:04.520
me. I don't, you know, of course, my technology is linked to these companies that have problematic

10:04.520 --> 10:09.080
practices. And now we are seeing how it can go awry, which means that we have all of this

10:09.080 --> 10:14.120
opportunity to build better structures for the control of our infrastructure. So you have a very

10:14.120 --> 10:20.120
positive outlook for the future because there's just something happening out there and there's

10:20.120 --> 10:26.040
a bit of a movement. Yes. And we're ready. Like we're here. We've been working on this work for so

10:26.040 --> 10:31.320
long. We don't have everything. You know, I wish we were further along. I wish our alternatives

10:31.320 --> 10:37.640
were better. But we have good solutions for a lot of the things that people care about. And if we

10:37.640 --> 10:42.120
could get a, like, if we can keep this momentum going and get a little bit more of a mind share,

10:42.120 --> 10:49.560
we have a chance to like truly pull people over. Because if we don't, it's going to be all Elon Musk.

10:50.200 --> 10:59.160
Okay. Just talking about your billionaire companies. And oh, let's say problematic.

11:01.320 --> 11:08.920
You also do a lot of work on medical devices. And could you talk to me a bit about why it's so

11:08.920 --> 11:19.000
important to advocate for free software on medical devices? Yes, definitely. So I have an

11:19.000 --> 11:25.480
implanted pacemaker defibrillator. And at first, when I got diagnosed with my heart condition,

11:25.480 --> 11:33.560
which I was born with. So it's in my family. So I know, no, we didn't realize it was hereditary.

11:33.560 --> 11:39.080
But now looking back, we say, oh, we now we understand, you know, what happened there. So I have

11:39.080 --> 11:45.960
a defibrillator, which has been generally preventative. It's there because I'm at a very risk of the medical

11:45.960 --> 11:53.960
term is sudden death. All right. Just gives me a chill as well, but not an positive chill.

11:53.960 --> 11:57.880
I have a defibrillator. So it's there and ready and waiting is something happens. So don't worry,

11:57.880 --> 12:03.160
nothing's going to happen. Because now we're a person. So you would be responsive. You'd have to

12:03.160 --> 12:09.080
like, right? Anyway, okay, we're being honest. I would do my best. No, it's going to be fine. So

12:09.080 --> 12:14.920
when I first got the defibrillator, I thought that this was an issue about transparency. I was

12:14.920 --> 12:21.880
really, I sort of, as someone who went to engineering school and then law school, it was about,

12:22.680 --> 12:27.080
you know, being able to see the source code in my own body and being able to audit it and

12:27.080 --> 12:31.400
making sure that it was account, like I could hold the technology and the company accountable.

12:31.960 --> 12:36.760
And I thought that was the most important issue. And then as I lived with my defibrillator,

12:36.840 --> 12:45.640
I had these experiences that were that really were, well, I'll just say they were very upsetting.

12:45.640 --> 12:50.040
And they really made me change the way that I looked at my technology. So when I was pregnant,

12:50.680 --> 12:55.240
my heart did what a normal pregnant woman's heart does. I had palpitations. It's very normal,

12:55.240 --> 12:59.640
like a quarter to a third of all women have palpitations. But my defibrillator thought I was an

12:59.640 --> 13:04.680
irregular rhythm. And so it shocked me unnecessarily. Like I didn't need treatment, but it thought I did.

13:04.680 --> 13:09.160
So it shocked me repeatedly. And the only way I could stop it was by taking

13:09.960 --> 13:13.800
drugs that slowed down my heart rate so much that it was tough walking up a flight of stairs.

13:14.520 --> 13:21.960
Now it was okay because the pregnancy ended. I could stop taking those drugs. Everything was fine.

13:21.960 --> 13:28.600
Everybody was fine. But it stood for the proposition of like, what do we do when our technology

13:28.600 --> 13:35.160
is not made for us? Right? After doing some research, I saw that only 15% of defibrillators go to

13:35.160 --> 13:42.040
people under the age of 65. Fewer than half of defibrillator patients are women. So the set of people

13:42.040 --> 13:48.040
who have defibrillators and are pregnant are teeny, teeny tiny. And the device manufacturers

13:48.040 --> 13:53.480
do not want pregnant people getting shocked. That is like the last thing they want. Like they definitely

13:53.560 --> 13:59.320
don't want pregnant patients being shocked. It's what a nightmare, right? But they just aren't very

13:59.320 --> 14:05.800
many. So it's not an issue they worry about. And there's a workaround. And so the question is like,

14:05.800 --> 14:13.240
what else is there that our technology is not designed for? And we will be as I was in that moment

14:13.240 --> 14:19.720
completely helpless to do anything about it. We will be looking for workarounds, right? If we

14:19.720 --> 14:25.560
don't have access to the complete and corresponding source code and the scripts to control compilation

14:25.560 --> 14:33.480
and installation, which I'm cribbing from, of course, GPLV2. But if we don't have the source code

14:33.480 --> 14:41.000
and the scripts to do something about it to install, we're just at the mercy of what resources these

14:41.000 --> 14:46.200
companies have to spend. And of course, the priority of these companies ultimately is their profit,

14:46.200 --> 14:50.760
even though they want to do a good job, everyone working at a medical device company wants to help

14:50.760 --> 14:56.760
people. But ultimately, their priorities will be set by where they can put their resources.

14:56.760 --> 15:02.440
So if we can do things differently, if we do things in a software freedom way, then we have a chance.

15:02.440 --> 15:06.600
We have agency. We can get together and build alternate power structures, alternate ways of

15:06.600 --> 15:14.200
creating our technology. And we have the opportunity to to add a technology in the way that everybody

15:14.200 --> 15:21.080
is treated right way. Exactly. And you asked about medical devices generally. And I think that

15:21.080 --> 15:25.800
medical devices in particular are so personal. They're connected with our bodies and our health.

15:25.800 --> 15:31.880
I always say we're in the process of becoming an unbecoming cyborgs. And as we age, but also as

15:31.880 --> 15:37.160
our society shifts, we become dependent on our devices. And so nothing is more important for us to

15:37.160 --> 15:42.920
have control over. It's part of bodily autonomy. So software freedom is really an, it's an issue

15:42.920 --> 15:47.080
about autonomy and agency and who controls our digital and physical destiny.

15:48.520 --> 15:58.520
What was the approach you took on to bring change to this to companies and to let people know

15:58.520 --> 16:06.040
by its own point to free medical devices? So I want to be totally plain in this interview.

16:06.040 --> 16:11.480
I guess I'm always plain. Well, I was very honest enough for, but I failed to

16:11.560 --> 16:16.680
effectuate any real change with the medical device manufacturers. I was so optimistic about what

16:16.680 --> 16:23.800
I could accomplish just by asking for people to change by thinking that if I were to set out the

16:23.800 --> 16:29.080
issue clearly, then everyone would see that this was the case and they would of course be sensible

16:29.080 --> 16:36.600
thinking people and they would help me advocate for this change. And so I probably will not

16:36.600 --> 16:42.680
surprise more cynical listeners that to hear that of course that didn't happen. And that I asked

16:42.680 --> 16:47.240
the company for the source code and wanted to talk about the issues. And I just got the run around

16:47.240 --> 16:58.680
over and over again. And it just, I even have some challenges in getting doctors to understand the

16:58.680 --> 17:06.040
issue. And in fact, I had an electrophysiologist hang up on me when I was trying to explain to him

17:06.040 --> 17:15.160
that these devices are vulnerable and that they can be taken control of. And I was telling him,

17:16.200 --> 17:21.800
it was right around the time that Dick Cheney had gotten, Dick Cheney was a US politician who

17:21.800 --> 17:29.000
was very, very powerful. And he had gotten a defibrillator, a heart device that he had the radio

17:29.000 --> 17:35.960
telemetry disabled, the remote component disabled for security reasons. And I was like,

17:35.960 --> 17:41.320
there's a reason why Dick Cheney doesn't want to have a broadcasting device. You know,

17:42.040 --> 17:49.800
there, these things are vulnerable. And I think I made the electrophysiologist nervous, the doctor

17:49.800 --> 17:55.960
nervous that somehow I was looking to bring a lawsuit or something like that, which I was not,

17:57.160 --> 18:02.840
it was very demoralizing. And I had to find a new, he said, if you want to get the device,

18:02.840 --> 18:06.600
I'll help you. But I don't know what you're trying to accomplish through all these questions.

18:06.600 --> 18:11.240
And I was really looking for a doctor who would understand that these issues are important and

18:11.240 --> 18:17.560
help me have a conversation with a medical device manufacturer. And I've found some great

18:17.560 --> 18:22.920
electrophysiologists since then and some of them have been much more willing to work with me.

18:22.920 --> 18:27.320
But they're focused on treating their patients and they're very focused. They're real experts

18:27.400 --> 18:33.880
in their field. And I haven't found any electrophysiologists who want this to be their issue and to

18:33.880 --> 18:40.760
crusade with us. If anybody listening knows of one, please put them in touch with me because

18:41.400 --> 18:47.000
there's so much, there's so much we can do. But I did get to an electrophysiologist who

18:47.960 --> 18:52.360
understood my concern with the radio telemetry. And when I was time for me to replace my first

18:52.360 --> 18:58.520
of you later with my second one, the electrophysiologist set me up in a room with a nurse practitioner

18:58.520 --> 19:03.720
and let me call all the device manufacturers to ask all of my questions straight away to them.

19:03.720 --> 19:08.440
And it was amazing. And the nurse practitioner was awesome and put the phone on speaker.

19:08.440 --> 19:13.560
And we got to use the secret doctor line that they can use to get support right away.

19:13.560 --> 19:18.760
And there was, I'll never forget, we met with one of the companies that's the fourth largest

19:18.840 --> 19:22.280
in the United States or was at the time. I'm not sure where the rankings are now, but it's

19:22.280 --> 19:28.520
called biotronic. And they're still in business. And they said, oh, our devices are hack proof.

19:29.160 --> 19:34.280
And I was like, how can something be hack proof? Right. It's like, what do you mean your

19:34.280 --> 19:39.880
devices are hack proof? I started to giggle, but the nurse practitioner put me on mute.

19:40.200 --> 19:43.800
Okay, don't laugh at them.

19:45.160 --> 19:50.440
And the biotronic rep said, well, the metronic, which is the first largest, and the

19:50.440 --> 19:56.680
Boston scientific devices have all been shown to be vulnerable, but nobody's ever hacked ours.

19:56.680 --> 20:01.960
And I was like, well, that's because you're the fourth largest. Nobody starts trying to show

20:01.960 --> 20:08.920
that the least popular device is, anyway, I said, I said, I invite you, I love, why don't you

20:08.920 --> 20:13.800
send me some devices and I'll get some volunteers. And we'll see whether your devices are hack proof.

20:13.800 --> 20:15.800
And I'm still waiting for this. Oh, no.

20:18.120 --> 20:23.560
But there happened, so to do that process, I got very like, I basically started to just give up

20:23.560 --> 20:29.320
on working directly with the device manufacturers. They're just, their incentives are not appropriately

20:29.320 --> 20:35.080
aligned. And I just didn't think that I was going to effectuate much change. So I wound up

20:35.960 --> 20:42.200
working more on things like the DMCA in the United States. We have the Digital Millennial

20:42.200 --> 20:48.600
Copyright Act, which is just a disaster, and it imposes potentially criminal liabilities for

20:48.600 --> 20:57.240
trying to circumvent technological protection measures. And so there are, and there's a

20:57.240 --> 21:05.080
tri-annual process where you can come in and say, we need exceptions to this rule. And so I

21:05.080 --> 21:10.520
participated in the rulemaking there and got an exception to be able to circumvent any kind of DRM

21:10.520 --> 21:15.400
or other kinds of restrictions on your medical devices. So that, for example, if you have an

21:15.400 --> 21:21.320
insulin pump and you want to more tightly control your own insulin delivery and make an artificial

21:21.400 --> 21:28.360
pancreas like Open APS does, you can do that and not worry about some of the Digital Millennial

21:28.360 --> 21:33.400
Copyright Act restrictions in the United States. And so we weren't able to successfully get that

21:34.280 --> 21:41.400
that exception. And then we renewed it over and over again. So that's something that we have

21:41.400 --> 21:46.840
been able to accomplish. But I think more importantly, the medical devices are metaphor for the

21:46.840 --> 21:51.880
software we rely on. And it's an example people can understand. And it is life or death. And once

21:51.880 --> 21:58.280
you get to that point where you get people to understand, like, oh, this is serious. This is a

21:58.280 --> 22:04.920
medical device. Oh, I could see how it's vulnerable, even though of all of the pieces of technology

22:05.640 --> 22:11.160
that we have, it has like very careful security mechanisms. And it is still vulnerable.

22:12.040 --> 22:18.280
Oh, man, we want to be really careful about your health, right? Like it walks people from

22:18.280 --> 22:23.400
point A to point B, which then gets you to point C of like, well, it's not just our medical devices.

22:23.400 --> 22:32.040
It's all kinds of things that are life and death. And then they understand that free software

22:32.040 --> 22:37.080
is there to help them to control their technology. Right. It's not all about ice cream and

22:37.720 --> 22:48.440
skateboard. Talking about add-ons. Very nice book, by the way. So there was this exception made.

22:49.240 --> 22:57.160
But how did other administrations or like, this is a digital act, but how did administrations

22:57.160 --> 23:02.200
in the US, especially the US Food and Drug Administration, who I know you have also talked to

23:02.840 --> 23:07.560
and reacted to this because this should be a topic that they care about. As you said,

23:07.560 --> 23:15.160
it's life or death. You would think. Yeah. No, I did have some early success with my advocacy at the

23:15.160 --> 23:23.080
FDA, where the head of cybersecurity at the FDA. And I had a very long conversation and that ended

23:23.080 --> 23:27.640
in a public conversation because we were on a panel together. And we continued some of the things

23:27.640 --> 23:34.280
that we were having privately, where in the middle of the panel, he said, oh, you know,

23:34.280 --> 23:40.360
well, first he said, the FDA is a small agency. We don't have the resources to vet the software

23:40.360 --> 23:48.200
on every single device. And then he stopped in the middle and he said, oh, actually, you're saying

23:48.200 --> 23:53.640
that we don't need to do that. You're saying that other people would like other other people,

23:53.640 --> 23:58.920
we don't even know would be doing that. And I was like, right. And he was like, that's very

23:58.920 --> 24:09.880
interesting. So we were having some early success, but ultimately, the process to publish these

24:09.880 --> 24:18.440
security guidelines, I don't want to say got away from us, but change the dialogues efficiently

24:18.440 --> 24:26.440
that everything about, it's a very conservative agency, understandably. So trying to shift the

24:26.440 --> 24:31.960
paradigm in terms of getting people to understand the way technology works and how free software could

24:31.960 --> 24:37.480
benefit this process, it's too theoretical for them to be able to embrace at the moment,

24:37.480 --> 24:42.040
because all of the device manufacturers are proprietary software. And they're saying, no, no,

24:42.040 --> 24:47.560
we need to keep it proprietary. So there's an opportunity for dialogue, but there's so much

24:49.240 --> 24:55.480
there's so many different issues that patients are advocating with the FDA and with regulators,

24:56.360 --> 25:03.400
that this is just one issue among many. And it becomes very difficult to get to really get any traction.

25:03.400 --> 25:08.440
And it's interesting because there is like one of us active in each of these spaces. So I'm

25:08.440 --> 25:14.760
obviously the software freedom medical device like advocate in the United States, but then

25:15.320 --> 25:19.320
there's another person who actually has my same heart condition, is only a few years older than

25:19.320 --> 25:24.120
me, and he has the same device that I, well, he had the same device I got a different one. But,

25:24.680 --> 25:30.520
but yeah, and he's advocating for patient access to data. And then there's so like there's

25:30.520 --> 25:35.960
a different person for each like little niche. And of course, ultimately at the end of the day,

25:36.520 --> 25:41.400
we're kind of ancillary to the process. It's completely messed up to think about it that way,

25:41.400 --> 25:46.920
but it's really the doctors and the device manufacturers who are control of this process.

25:46.920 --> 25:52.040
And the patients are just the people who have the devices. We're not the customer. Because we're

25:52.040 --> 25:56.040
not making any purchasing decisions. We're not choosing our brand of defibrillators. We're

25:56.040 --> 26:02.920
relying entirely on doctors. And also on day expert opinion. That's right. So it's a long road.

26:02.920 --> 26:09.800
I really thought that it would take just five years. And everyone would see that this like the

26:09.800 --> 26:15.880
truth of this issue. And we would come around. But it is, it is not easy at all. And I think the

26:15.880 --> 26:20.920
worst part about it is that is the standards component of it now, which is that, you know,

26:21.640 --> 26:26.120
there's not even the ability to use different equipment on different devices. So

26:26.920 --> 26:33.640
I needed to get my defibrillator read last week in New York. But because I have a defibrillator

26:33.640 --> 26:37.960
from a company that has a very, it's a large European company with a very small presence in the

26:37.960 --> 26:43.160
United States. I picked it because it's the only one that I could switch off the radio telemetry.

26:43.160 --> 26:48.360
And I've had threats due to the diversity and inclusion work that I do. So I just wanted to make

26:48.360 --> 26:54.440
sure, right, how are you doing? So I want, I don't want my device to be broadcasting remotely

26:54.440 --> 26:59.480
and vulnerable in that way. And so in order to get my information off my device, I have to go

26:59.480 --> 27:04.280
somewhere where there's a like a specialized piece of equipment. It's called a programmer

27:04.280 --> 27:10.680
to read the device. And there's one representative in New York City. And that representative

27:10.680 --> 27:16.840
was out of the country. And the company had no backup. Oh, no. And now admittedly, it was because

27:16.840 --> 27:21.640
I was leaving on Saturday. And this was Wednesday that I realized I needed to get this information

27:21.640 --> 27:28.840
before traveling to see if it was safe. But I couldn't do it. So I had to, I had to get it done

27:28.920 --> 27:35.000
in Brussels. They did. I went to the hospital. I did a little medical tourism. But it's how absurd is

27:35.000 --> 27:44.840
that? It is really, really absurd. You know, and it just none of our technology is stable in this

27:44.840 --> 27:51.080
way because we allow the companies to make their own products that don't interoperate or talk to

27:51.080 --> 27:55.560
any of the other equipment. And it's related to these issues around software freedom, but it's kind

27:55.560 --> 28:02.280
of like a separate dependence as well. Yeah, exactly. As much as I keep thinking, I figured out

28:02.600 --> 28:07.560
at least what the issues are. And then something else happens in my life. And it's a sudden,

28:09.320 --> 28:14.440
actually, I only, I only knew half of the issues before. I mean, you know, we all know that these

28:14.440 --> 28:20.840
are the issues. But when you experience them firsthand and you see the, the problematic outcomes

28:20.920 --> 28:30.520
from it, there's a company called Second Site, which started to, I think it actually declared bankruptcy.

28:30.520 --> 28:37.400
But it was an amazing company where there were, it was making eye implants and these retinal

28:37.400 --> 28:42.600
implants and people who had completely lost their vision who were completely blind could get these

28:42.600 --> 28:50.920
implants and see, not like see everything per se, but see enough where there's one woman

28:51.960 --> 28:58.520
who is a patient who gave an interview who said like, I remember the moment where I was changing

28:58.520 --> 29:07.080
trains in the subway. And all of a sudden, everything went dark. And I lost my vision again,

29:07.880 --> 29:12.920
right in the middle of my commute because the company was no longer issuing support

29:13.480 --> 29:19.320
for their devices. And she's, you know, the patients were out of luck because the company

29:19.960 --> 29:27.400
was VC funded and lost its resources. And now, those patients have useless

29:28.040 --> 29:33.000
implants in their body, which would be dangerous to remove. That could, that are completely

29:33.000 --> 29:38.600
functional. They could actually help them see if they could only be updated and maintained.

29:38.600 --> 29:43.720
So some people are maintaining them on their own or coming together or working with researchers

29:43.720 --> 29:48.200
to try to find like academics who might try to help them. So some of them are able to find,

29:48.200 --> 29:53.480
and it's not just that one company, it's several companies on multiple medical devices. And so

29:53.480 --> 29:58.440
intellectually, I thought, oh, that's so rough, you know, like that's what a horrible thing,

29:58.440 --> 30:03.560
literally people who could see who can't see anymore, but were the fact that we were able to

30:03.560 --> 30:08.200
have software freedom where we could work together and silently to improve that technology.

30:08.760 --> 30:13.240
And then it actually has happened to me. I think I'm going to have to get surgery

30:13.240 --> 30:21.960
to remove this medical device and get another one because if I can't get my information off

30:22.040 --> 30:28.200
of my device, how can I, how can I, if I can't talk to it, how can I count on it? And that was a

30:28.200 --> 30:33.400
very large manufacturer with a smaller presence in the United States, but still a significant presence

30:33.400 --> 30:38.760
that has now dwindled to almost nothing. It's, you know, it's the same, it's the same as the

30:38.760 --> 30:44.440
Twitter story, right? It's the same exact thing. Like companies are vulnerable to change of control.

30:44.440 --> 30:48.440
And you don't know whether your priorities will be their priorities.

30:48.520 --> 30:54.360
Sorry, we just had a break. We're at a conference, so people are walking by.

30:54.360 --> 31:01.720
Yeah, that's true. So when we're talking about this problem with companies and what happens to

31:01.720 --> 31:06.600
if the company, for example, goes bankrupt, there was an article in nature about this.

31:07.400 --> 31:12.200
That's exactly what I'm referring to. The nature article summarizes it nicely. So there are

31:12.200 --> 31:17.240
a few articles about the second-side situation and the nature article brings in a few other devices as

31:17.240 --> 31:21.720
well. It's definitely worth a read. I don't know if you do show notes or anything like that.

31:21.720 --> 31:27.480
Yeah, I would put it in the show notes, so people can go to it and take a look at it.

31:30.680 --> 31:36.440
Thank you so much for talking about this to me because it is quite a complex topic,

31:37.240 --> 31:43.160
but I would get the feeling that there's also a bit of progress. Would you say that as well or

31:43.240 --> 31:47.320
what's your feeding point of future about this? I think there's definitely progress. So I think

31:47.320 --> 31:52.920
that the work that we've seen in the insulin pump space, so I think the fact that so many people

31:52.920 --> 31:59.000
have benefited from having control over their insulin pumps. So what the insulin pump patients

31:59.000 --> 32:04.760
were doing was they were taking old insulin pumps that actually had a security vulnerability on them

32:04.760 --> 32:09.320
that allowed for interference, and they were using that security vulnerability

32:09.320 --> 32:14.040
but to provide more precise treatment for themselves, and they were able to introduce what they

32:14.040 --> 32:21.480
call a closed loop system of insulin delivery, which helps, seems to help most people, but especially

32:21.480 --> 32:29.400
kids who are diabetic. So it was really like, if there's so many inspiring stories, and because

32:29.400 --> 32:36.360
it's been so successful, I think that the device manufacturers are more open to talking about it now

32:36.360 --> 32:41.480
because there's years worth of data of patients having successful outcomes, and they call it the

32:41.480 --> 32:45.640
we're not waiting movement because they're not waiting for the device manufacturers to come to

32:45.640 --> 32:50.520
these conclusions and to be able to provide that kind of treatment. So I think there's that,

32:50.520 --> 32:55.560
and then I think that also the fact that we've seen vulnerabilities across the board,

32:56.360 --> 33:02.920
right, where devices that are closed and proprietary are also vulnerable, that people are

33:02.920 --> 33:08.360
starting to really understand fundamentally the truths about software security. So I do think

33:08.360 --> 33:13.080
that things are changing in a positive way. I still think that especially in the United States,

33:13.080 --> 33:19.000
I don't know how it is in Europe, although it seems similar for my device interrogation,

33:19.000 --> 33:24.200
most people don't consider the patient, like the patients that are not really, they're very

33:24.200 --> 33:29.240
generally quite passive in terms of what devices they get and how they use them, and I think that

33:29.240 --> 33:34.760
that's one of the ways in which is changing too, as people get devices that are more technically

33:34.760 --> 33:42.520
savvy. I mean, most of the device, most of the patient advocates that I'm aware of are like younger

33:42.520 --> 33:49.720
people, I think I can still say that younger people like me, I'm still far from 65 at least,

33:51.080 --> 33:56.440
not as young as I was when I got my certificate later, but yeah, at that point people would say,

33:56.440 --> 34:03.080
you're so young, and now they're like, you're young. And we're like, oh, I thought only really old

34:03.080 --> 34:12.360
people had, anyway. But yeah, so I think that as more technical people get these devices, they

34:12.360 --> 34:17.320
ask more informed questions, and they're able to advocate for themselves and other patients,

34:17.320 --> 34:22.440
and so I think that is changing, and I think there's opportunity, and I think it's on the upswing,

34:23.240 --> 34:29.000
it's just that like everything else around software freedom, the changes that we need to make

34:29.000 --> 34:37.960
are so big that they really require large societal investment. Bradley Kuhn, who I work with,

34:37.960 --> 34:43.160
who founded Software Freedom Conservancy with me, likes to say, everything is politically

34:43.160 --> 34:48.600
unviable until the moment that it is not. And that's exactly what's happening now, where people

34:48.600 --> 34:54.200
are waking up to this issue, and it previously had been something that politicians and other people

34:55.640 --> 35:01.480
had trouble understanding, and certainly we're not interested in prioritizing. And now that the

35:01.480 --> 35:06.200
everyday person is worried about the ethics of their technology, they're starting to wake up.

35:07.160 --> 35:13.720
Yeah, it's changing, it's changing in every corner, and it's not just Twitter, and the Twitter

35:13.720 --> 35:19.000
users moving to Macedonia, and it's also that the understanding of technology and how important it

35:19.000 --> 35:27.480
is in our lives is changing, and how much we rely on it. Yes, it's across the board. I like the

35:27.480 --> 35:33.800
Twitter example just because so many people took action, so I like that. It's just that it's like

35:33.800 --> 35:40.600
an example that I think we can see in other spaces, and it was also unusual because we were so ready

35:40.680 --> 35:46.200
with an alternative that worked. So there was a place for people to go. So I think we're going to

35:46.200 --> 35:53.400
see a lot more of that. I hope so too. Last question. As you know, we have the I Love Free Software Day.

35:53.400 --> 35:59.720
On this day, we read out to people who work very hard for free software throughout the year. And

36:00.600 --> 36:06.440
we say thank you to them. We say thank you for all the work they have done over the last year

36:06.520 --> 36:12.040
for free software, because it's quite a lot, as you know, you have to fix bugs, you have to deal

36:12.040 --> 36:18.280
with issues, you have to improve software. So I was wondering if there's a project or a person

36:18.280 --> 36:23.960
that you would like to say thank you to. It's a theme from what I have done what I said earlier today,

36:23.960 --> 36:30.120
but at the moment, I really want to thank Matthias, because I think that that book is really just

36:30.120 --> 36:37.000
such a wonderful step towards making people understand about software freedom. Like I love it.

36:37.000 --> 36:42.920
I mean, he runs the FSFE and does such a wonderful job. And all of you that work there are like,

36:42.920 --> 36:49.640
you work so hard and you make such great, like I love public money, public code. And you know,

36:50.440 --> 36:54.200
software freedom conservancy, we're a global organization, but we do have a particular

36:54.280 --> 37:00.440
US focus. And it's such a relief to have an organization doing such a good job in Europe. And so

37:00.440 --> 37:06.120
I'm like, we're at FASM. And so we've been working, especially with FSFE folks to run the legal

37:06.120 --> 37:11.320
and policy dev room. And as I said earlier, our stands are right next to each other. So it feels like

37:11.320 --> 37:15.880
like there's a lot of progress, but I'm so grateful for all of you at FSFE, really. Thank you so

37:15.880 --> 37:24.840
much for your work. Thank you. Oh, my God. Very nice. Oh, God. Thank you so much for your time.

37:24.840 --> 37:29.640
And thank you for joining me in the software freedom podcast. Thank you. I really loved it. If

37:29.640 --> 37:35.880
people want to find out more, our site is sfconservancy.org. If you or someone you know is subject to

37:35.880 --> 37:41.080
systemic bias or underrepresentation, Outreachee is paid remote internships, which might be a great

37:41.080 --> 37:47.240
opportunity for you. Please consider that. That's outreachee.org. And help us spread the word about

37:47.240 --> 37:51.720
software freedom. We're making so much progress. And you listeners, you're like, you're a big part of

37:51.720 --> 37:56.680
this. And I'm going to put all the links in the show note. Fantastic. Thanks so much. Thank you so

37:56.680 --> 38:02.520
much, Karen. Bye, bye. Bye. This was the software freedom podcast. If you liked this episode,

38:02.520 --> 38:07.480
please recommend it to your friends and rate it. Also subscribe to make sure you will get the next

38:08.440 --> 38:12.360
episode. This podcast was presented to you by the Free Software Foundation Europe. We are

38:12.360 --> 38:18.280
charity that empowers users to control technology. If you would like to support us in our work,

38:18.280 --> 38:36.440
please go to fsfe.org slash donate.

Back to the episode SFP#19