Say no to locked-down devices that limit our freedom to install apps and switch operating systems. Say yes to device neutrality, which ensures that we control our own hardware! Your device, your choice! Support our demand for the right to install any software on our devices.

Transcript of SFP#19: Why we need Free Software on medical devices with Karen Sandler

Back to the episode SFP#19

This is a transcript created with the Free Software tool Whisper. For more information and feedback reach out to podcast@fsfe.org

WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:19.440
Welcome to the Software Freedom Podcast. This podcast is presented to you by the free

00:19.440 --> 00:24.760
Software Foundation Europe. We are a charity that empowers users to control technology.

00:24.760 --> 00:29.960
I'm Bonnie Merring and our guest for today's episode is Karen Sandler. Karen is an attorney

00:30.280 --> 00:36.520
and the executive director of the NGO Software Freedom Conservancy. Karen has also

00:36.520 --> 00:41.720
a very personal relationship with her software as she is depending on a medical device connected

00:41.720 --> 00:47.720
to her heart, which is called a filibrator. This helps her to keep working and is also a

00:47.720 --> 00:53.000
livesaving device for her. But this device, like many medical devices, is thrown by known

00:53.000 --> 00:58.920
free software. So it's unknown how it works and Karen has no control of it. Today, Karen will

00:58.920 --> 01:03.560
talk with us about how this changed her relationship with software and also the problems that

01:03.560 --> 01:09.400
occur with medical devices. Welcome to the Software Freedom Podcast, Karen. And I'm really

01:09.400 --> 01:15.080
glad that we have this opportunity to talk about your love for free software. Thank you so much.

01:15.080 --> 01:22.360
I am so excited to talk to you. We are actually in person, which is just so exciting and different

01:22.440 --> 01:28.920
and wonderful at Phosdom. That's true. I haven't been at an impersonal event for ages, I think.

01:29.480 --> 01:35.000
It's just, yeah, this is one of the first things that I've been to. Certainly my first trip

01:36.040 --> 01:44.920
transatlantic since COVID. And the last Phosdom in 2020 was basically like the last big event.

01:44.920 --> 01:51.080
So it's very exciting that it's happening again. And how does it feel to be back here at Phosdom

01:51.080 --> 01:58.200
now in person after two years of break? It is, you know, it's mixed. I'm very, I'm a little nervous.

01:59.400 --> 02:05.480
I don't know if keen listeners can hear, but I am wearing a mask. You know, some things are

02:05.480 --> 02:10.520
really different than they were before. I have a her condition I was born with. And so I have to be

02:10.520 --> 02:17.000
a little bit more careful than most people. So there's that. But it is just the best thing in the

02:17.000 --> 02:24.040
world to be here in the university filled with people who care so much about software freedom.

02:24.040 --> 02:28.520
I mean, we go through our daily lives talking to people about software freedom hoping that they

02:28.520 --> 02:34.120
will understand why this issue is important and like explaining the problems with our technology.

02:34.120 --> 02:39.560
And then to come to a place where there are so many people who already know about this issue and

02:39.560 --> 02:46.840
care about it, it's very overwhelming in the best kind of way. Oh my god. How do you feel about

02:46.840 --> 02:51.400
free software? Like what comes to your mind when you hear it? The term free software.

02:52.200 --> 02:58.760
It's so interesting, you know, I think like I'm so entrenched in the world of free software. And it's

02:58.760 --> 03:06.200
been my life for so long that when I hear the word free software, honestly, by itself, I'm often

03:06.280 --> 03:11.320
reminded of the political differences that we've had over time. And the arguments we've had about

03:11.320 --> 03:18.520
terminology, which I think have divided us. And so I'm particularly excited to be talking to you now

03:18.520 --> 03:25.160
here because it's the software freedom podcast. And I would note that the FSFE booth, there's a

03:25.160 --> 03:31.160
stand that falls down like which are tables. And they're in the like entryway of the university

03:31.160 --> 03:37.240
building. And we have two of the best tables in the entire conference. So when you go in the front

03:37.240 --> 03:43.000
door of the big building where you expect to see the stands, the the software freedom conservancy

03:43.000 --> 03:49.160
and the FSFE booths are right there right next to each other. It's pretty exciting. And so

03:50.840 --> 03:56.520
it depends on the day when I hear the terms free software, software freedom. I think like

03:56.680 --> 04:07.480
it's a cause that I'm so excited about now that I think just, you know, if like the word alone,

04:08.280 --> 04:15.480
especially like thinking of software freedom is just like just still very exciting to me. It's

04:15.480 --> 04:23.080
like full of possibility. How do you feel about it? Oh my god. How do I feel? I feel very empowered

04:23.160 --> 04:30.760
because it gives me the so much opportunities, you know, I can learn by it. And that's the most

04:30.760 --> 04:39.000
amazing thing for me because I love to learn. That's why I can't imagine stop thing to study

04:39.000 --> 04:45.640
anything because I'm like, oh my god. But if I am not able to go to a lecture anymore and

04:46.120 --> 04:53.880
just sit and learn, yeah. So that's intrinsic to the whole free software ecosystem, right? It's

04:53.880 --> 04:58.360
the idea that you don't just take anything for granted. You never get to the point where you know

04:58.360 --> 05:02.920
everything. Our projects are never at the point where they're finished. It's never good enough

05:02.920 --> 05:07.240
because there's always more work that we can do. There's always improvements we can do. And we

05:07.240 --> 05:11.720
always have to ask the questions of like, what don't we know? What can we learn about? What can we

05:11.720 --> 05:19.800
improve? Yeah, that's how I feel about free software. So it can relate to that. Talking about

05:19.800 --> 05:30.360
knowledge and learning and universities, I hear you earn an honorary doctor. How do you feel about

05:30.360 --> 05:39.160
that? Honestly, it's so exciting that it feels like a dream. Like I feel like I'm going to wake up

05:39.240 --> 05:49.800
and it didn't happen. So getting an honorary doctorate is obviously a huge honor no matter

05:49.800 --> 05:55.080
what the circumstances. And the fact that it's connected to the work that I have done on

05:55.080 --> 06:04.040
software freedom, diversity inclusion, and the full extent of things that I have worked on is

06:04.840 --> 06:13.400
super cool, but it like every piece of this kind of like gets cooler because the university

06:13.400 --> 06:22.200
Kai live in, they give five honorary degrees per year. Four of them are nominated by faculty. So

06:23.160 --> 06:29.560
they're often faculty members whose work has been influenced or inspired by someone. And so the

06:29.560 --> 06:37.720
promoter will submit those names and like there's like an academic component to it where, you know,

06:37.720 --> 06:43.720
anyway. So, but the fifth one, which is the one I got, is nominated by the students. And

06:43.720 --> 06:51.000
Kai live in as a huge university. So it's like just this massive honor because the students

06:51.640 --> 06:56.440
surely get, it's like over 60,000 students. So they surely get at least a few recommendations,

06:56.440 --> 07:05.000
the student council and they research them and go through them. And knowing that the thing that

07:05.000 --> 07:11.640
I have been trying to explain to people and advocate for, that a few people have said at least,

07:11.640 --> 07:17.640
you know, we're convinced this is important. It was just massive and more importantly or most

07:17.640 --> 07:23.800
importantly about this whole thing is that students are the people we need to reach the most. I mean,

07:23.800 --> 07:29.560
we need to reach everybody at all levels of society. But if students can understand why software

07:29.560 --> 07:36.040
freedom really matters, like we have a chance to make some really broad sweeping change. And that's

07:36.040 --> 07:42.200
something that we've been working towards for a long time. And I, this is like a really just

07:42.200 --> 07:49.400
wonderful sign that it's possible. So I feel like very invigorated, very inspired and like really

07:49.400 --> 07:54.840
excited to do more work because like some of the students showed up at Bosnum who had been around

07:54.840 --> 08:01.640
for the thing. And the other thing is that they recorded a video about the work and like they

08:01.640 --> 08:08.280
got it all right, you know? Like not only just like they didn't fall into any terminology problems,

08:08.280 --> 08:13.960
which if they did, it wouldn't have been a problem. But not just that, they really understood what

08:13.960 --> 08:20.440
software freedom is, why it matters to them and to the like to society. And they were able to

08:20.440 --> 08:25.880
articulate it probably better than I ever would. This gives me a chill. Like if you talk about it,

08:25.880 --> 08:34.280
I'm feeling very accelerated. I think that would be the word. And yeah, it's just, I'm, yeah.

08:35.080 --> 08:40.920
I feel like a change for that. And it's amazing. Thanks. I really do feel like things have changed.

08:40.920 --> 08:45.480
Like I feel like the last few months, people who are a software freedom conservancy sustainers will

08:45.480 --> 08:49.880
have seen an email that I sent out at the end of the year. And I meant to make it into a blog post,

08:49.880 --> 08:55.240
but it just, it was really suited towards an email. I'll probably try to make it as a blog post

08:55.240 --> 09:01.960
later. But I really think that we've turned a corner. You know, what's happened with Elon Musk

09:01.960 --> 09:08.280
and Twitter is like just the latest in a series of examples of why our technology is vulnerable.

09:08.280 --> 09:14.440
And what can go wrong and why it can be so bad and why we don't want to rely on for-profit companies

09:14.440 --> 09:21.080
is single points of failure for our technology. And so it's amazing because people who don't know

09:21.080 --> 09:25.080
anything about technology are saying, I want to get off Twitter. And then suddenly there actually

09:25.080 --> 09:31.800
is a fedaverse to go to. We were ready. And you know, so many people have just switched over already.

09:31.800 --> 09:36.760
And it just shows what's possible. And I think that's really different than it was a year to five

09:36.760 --> 09:42.920
years ago. I think people understand that their technology is vulnerable. Like when we used to give

09:42.920 --> 09:47.640
talks, we used to have to like go through all of the examples of the ways in which your technology

09:47.640 --> 09:53.560
could be maliciously controlled and blah, blah, blah, blah. And people would say, oh, I didn't know

09:53.560 --> 09:59.160
that, you know, that that could happen. And now people are saying, of course, my phone is surveilling

09:59.160 --> 10:04.520
me. I don't, you know, of course, my technology is linked to these companies that have problematic

10:04.520 --> 10:09.080
practices. And now we are seeing how it can go awry, which means that we have all of this

10:09.080 --> 10:14.120
opportunity to build better structures for the control of our infrastructure. So you have a very

10:14.120 --> 10:20.120
positive outlook for the future because there's just something happening out there and there's

10:20.120 --> 10:26.040
a bit of a movement. Yes. And we're ready. Like we're here. We've been working on this work for so

10:26.040 --> 10:31.320
long. We don't have everything. You know, I wish we were further along. I wish our alternatives

10:31.320 --> 10:37.640
were better. But we have good solutions for a lot of the things that people care about. And if we

10:37.640 --> 10:42.120
could get a, like, if we can keep this momentum going and get a little bit more of a mind share,

10:42.120 --> 10:49.560
we have a chance to like truly pull people over. Because if we don't, it's going to be all Elon Musk.

10:50.200 --> 10:59.160
Okay. Just talking about your billionaire companies. And oh, let's say problematic.

11:01.320 --> 11:08.920
You also do a lot of work on medical devices. And could you talk to me a bit about why it's so

11:08.920 --> 11:19.000
important to advocate for free software on medical devices? Yes, definitely. So I have an

11:19.000 --> 11:25.480
implanted pacemaker defibrillator. And at first, when I got diagnosed with my heart condition,

11:25.480 --> 11:33.560
which I was born with. So it's in my family. So I know, no, we didn't realize it was hereditary.

11:33.560 --> 11:39.080
But now looking back, we say, oh, we now we understand, you know, what happened there. So I have

11:39.080 --> 11:45.960
a defibrillator, which has been generally preventative. It's there because I'm at a very risk of the medical

11:45.960 --> 11:53.960
term is sudden death. All right. Just gives me a chill as well, but not an positive chill.

11:53.960 --> 11:57.880
I have a defibrillator. So it's there and ready and waiting is something happens. So don't worry,

11:57.880 --> 12:03.160
nothing's going to happen. Because now we're a person. So you would be responsive. You'd have to

12:03.160 --> 12:09.080
like, right? Anyway, okay, we're being honest. I would do my best. No, it's going to be fine. So

12:09.080 --> 12:14.920
when I first got the defibrillator, I thought that this was an issue about transparency. I was

12:14.920 --> 12:21.880
really, I sort of, as someone who went to engineering school and then law school, it was about,

12:22.680 --> 12:27.080
you know, being able to see the source code in my own body and being able to audit it and

12:27.080 --> 12:31.400
making sure that it was account, like I could hold the technology and the company accountable.

12:31.960 --> 12:36.760
And I thought that was the most important issue. And then as I lived with my defibrillator,

12:36.840 --> 12:45.640
I had these experiences that were that really were, well, I'll just say they were very upsetting.

12:45.640 --> 12:50.040
And they really made me change the way that I looked at my technology. So when I was pregnant,

12:50.680 --> 12:55.240
my heart did what a normal pregnant woman's heart does. I had palpitations. It's very normal,

12:55.240 --> 12:59.640
like a quarter to a third of all women have palpitations. But my defibrillator thought I was an

12:59.640 --> 13:04.680
irregular rhythm. And so it shocked me unnecessarily. Like I didn't need treatment, but it thought I did.

13:04.680 --> 13:09.160
So it shocked me repeatedly. And the only way I could stop it was by taking

13:09.960 --> 13:13.800
drugs that slowed down my heart rate so much that it was tough walking up a flight of stairs.

13:14.520 --> 13:21.960
Now it was okay because the pregnancy ended. I could stop taking those drugs. Everything was fine.

13:21.960 --> 13:28.600
Everybody was fine. But it stood for the proposition of like, what do we do when our technology

13:28.600 --> 13:35.160
is not made for us? Right? After doing some research, I saw that only 15% of defibrillators go to

13:35.160 --> 13:42.040
people under the age of 65. Fewer than half of defibrillator patients are women. So the set of people

13:42.040 --> 13:48.040
who have defibrillators and are pregnant are teeny, teeny tiny. And the device manufacturers

13:48.040 --> 13:53.480
do not want pregnant people getting shocked. That is like the last thing they want. Like they definitely

13:53.560 --> 13:59.320
don't want pregnant patients being shocked. It's what a nightmare, right? But they just aren't very

13:59.320 --> 14:05.800
many. So it's not an issue they worry about. And there's a workaround. And so the question is like,

14:05.800 --> 14:13.240
what else is there that our technology is not designed for? And we will be as I was in that moment

14:13.240 --> 14:19.720
completely helpless to do anything about it. We will be looking for workarounds, right? If we

14:19.720 --> 14:25.560
don't have access to the complete and corresponding source code and the scripts to control compilation

14:25.560 --> 14:33.480
and installation, which I'm cribbing from, of course, GPLV2. But if we don't have the source code

14:33.480 --> 14:41.000
and the scripts to do something about it to install, we're just at the mercy of what resources these

14:41.000 --> 14:46.200
companies have to spend. And of course, the priority of these companies ultimately is their profit,

14:46.200 --> 14:50.760
even though they want to do a good job, everyone working at a medical device company wants to help

14:50.760 --> 14:56.760
people. But ultimately, their priorities will be set by where they can put their resources.

14:56.760 --> 15:02.440
So if we can do things differently, if we do things in a software freedom way, then we have a chance.

15:02.440 --> 15:06.600
We have agency. We can get together and build alternate power structures, alternate ways of

15:06.600 --> 15:14.200
creating our technology. And we have the opportunity to to add a technology in the way that everybody

15:14.200 --> 15:21.080
is treated right way. Exactly. And you asked about medical devices generally. And I think that

15:21.080 --> 15:25.800
medical devices in particular are so personal. They're connected with our bodies and our health.

15:25.800 --> 15:31.880
I always say we're in the process of becoming an unbecoming cyborgs. And as we age, but also as

15:31.880 --> 15:37.160
our society shifts, we become dependent on our devices. And so nothing is more important for us to

15:37.160 --> 15:42.920
have control over. It's part of bodily autonomy. So software freedom is really an, it's an issue

15:42.920 --> 15:47.080
about autonomy and agency and who controls our digital and physical destiny.

15:48.520 --> 15:58.520
What was the approach you took on to bring change to this to companies and to let people know

15:58.520 --> 16:06.040
by its own point to free medical devices? So I want to be totally plain in this interview.

16:06.040 --> 16:11.480
I guess I'm always plain. Well, I was very honest enough for, but I failed to

16:11.560 --> 16:16.680
effectuate any real change with the medical device manufacturers. I was so optimistic about what

16:16.680 --> 16:23.800
I could accomplish just by asking for people to change by thinking that if I were to set out the

16:23.800 --> 16:29.080
issue clearly, then everyone would see that this was the case and they would of course be sensible

16:29.080 --> 16:36.600
thinking people and they would help me advocate for this change. And so I probably will not

16:36.600 --> 16:42.680
surprise more cynical listeners that to hear that of course that didn't happen. And that I asked

16:42.680 --> 16:47.240
the company for the source code and wanted to talk about the issues. And I just got the run around

16:47.240 --> 16:58.680
over and over again. And it just, I even have some challenges in getting doctors to understand the

16:58.680 --> 17:06.040
issue. And in fact, I had an electrophysiologist hang up on me when I was trying to explain to him

17:06.040 --> 17:15.160
that these devices are vulnerable and that they can be taken control of. And I was telling him,

17:16.200 --> 17:21.800
it was right around the time that Dick Cheney had gotten, Dick Cheney was a US politician who

17:21.800 --> 17:29.000
was very, very powerful. And he had gotten a defibrillator, a heart device that he had the radio

17:29.000 --> 17:35.960
telemetry disabled, the remote component disabled for security reasons. And I was like,

17:35.960 --> 17:41.320
there's a reason why Dick Cheney doesn't want to have a broadcasting device. You know,

17:42.040 --> 17:49.800
there, these things are vulnerable. And I think I made the electrophysiologist nervous, the doctor

17:49.800 --> 17:55.960
nervous that somehow I was looking to bring a lawsuit or something like that, which I was not,

17:57.160 --> 18:02.840
it was very demoralizing. And I had to find a new, he said, if you want to get the device,

18:02.840 --> 18:06.600
I'll help you. But I don't know what you're trying to accomplish through all these questions.

18:06.600 --> 18:11.240
And I was really looking for a doctor who would understand that these issues are important and

18:11.240 --> 18:17.560
help me have a conversation with a medical device manufacturer. And I've found some great

18:17.560 --> 18:22.920
electrophysiologists since then and some of them have been much more willing to work with me.

18:22.920 --> 18:27.320
But they're focused on treating their patients and they're very focused. They're real experts

18:27.400 --> 18:33.880
in their field. And I haven't found any electrophysiologists who want this to be their issue and to

18:33.880 --> 18:40.760
crusade with us. If anybody listening knows of one, please put them in touch with me because

18:41.400 --> 18:47.000
there's so much, there's so much we can do. But I did get to an electrophysiologist who

18:47.960 --> 18:52.360
understood my concern with the radio telemetry. And when I was time for me to replace my first

18:52.360 --> 18:58.520
of you later with my second one, the electrophysiologist set me up in a room with a nurse practitioner

18:58.520 --> 19:03.720
and let me call all the device manufacturers to ask all of my questions straight away to them.

19:03.720 --> 19:08.440
And it was amazing. And the nurse practitioner was awesome and put the phone on speaker.

19:08.440 --> 19:13.560
And we got to use the secret doctor line that they can use to get support right away.

19:13.560 --> 19:18.760
And there was, I'll never forget, we met with one of the companies that's the fourth largest

19:18.840 --> 19:22.280
in the United States or was at the time. I'm not sure where the rankings are now, but it's

19:22.280 --> 19:28.520
called biotronic. And they're still in business. And they said, oh, our devices are hack proof.

19:29.160 --> 19:34.280
And I was like, how can something be hack proof? Right. It's like, what do you mean your

19:34.280 --> 19:39.880
devices are hack proof? I started to giggle, but the nurse practitioner put me on mute.

19:40.200 --> 19:43.800
Okay, don't laugh at them.

19:45.160 --> 19:50.440
And the biotronic rep said, well, the metronic, which is the first largest, and the

19:50.440 --> 19:56.680
Boston scientific devices have all been shown to be vulnerable, but nobody's ever hacked ours.

19:56.680 --> 20:01.960
And I was like, well, that's because you're the fourth largest. Nobody starts trying to show

20:01.960 --> 20:08.920
that the least popular device is, anyway, I said, I said, I invite you, I love, why don't you

20:08.920 --> 20:13.800
send me some devices and I'll get some volunteers. And we'll see whether your devices are hack proof.

20:13.800 --> 20:15.800
And I'm still waiting for this. Oh, no.

20:18.120 --> 20:23.560
But there happened, so to do that process, I got very like, I basically started to just give up

20:23.560 --> 20:29.320
on working directly with the device manufacturers. They're just, their incentives are not appropriately

20:29.320 --> 20:35.080
aligned. And I just didn't think that I was going to effectuate much change. So I wound up

20:35.960 --> 20:42.200
working more on things like the DMCA in the United States. We have the Digital Millennial

20:42.200 --> 20:48.600
Copyright Act, which is just a disaster, and it imposes potentially criminal liabilities for

20:48.600 --> 20:57.240
trying to circumvent technological protection measures. And so there are, and there's a

20:57.240 --> 21:05.080
tri-annual process where you can come in and say, we need exceptions to this rule. And so I

21:05.080 --> 21:10.520
participated in the rulemaking there and got an exception to be able to circumvent any kind of DRM

21:10.520 --> 21:15.400
or other kinds of restrictions on your medical devices. So that, for example, if you have an

21:15.400 --> 21:21.320
insulin pump and you want to more tightly control your own insulin delivery and make an artificial

21:21.400 --> 21:28.360
pancreas like Open APS does, you can do that and not worry about some of the Digital Millennial

21:28.360 --> 21:33.400
Copyright Act restrictions in the United States. And so we weren't able to successfully get that

21:34.280 --> 21:41.400
that exception. And then we renewed it over and over again. So that's something that we have

21:41.400 --> 21:46.840
been able to accomplish. But I think more importantly, the medical devices are metaphor for the

21:46.840 --> 21:51.880
software we rely on. And it's an example people can understand. And it is life or death. And once

21:51.880 --> 21:58.280
you get to that point where you get people to understand, like, oh, this is serious. This is a

21:58.280 --> 22:04.920
medical device. Oh, I could see how it's vulnerable, even though of all of the pieces of technology

22:05.640 --> 22:11.160
that we have, it has like very careful security mechanisms. And it is still vulnerable.

22:12.040 --> 22:18.280
Oh, man, we want to be really careful about your health, right? Like it walks people from

22:18.280 --> 22:23.400
point A to point B, which then gets you to point C of like, well, it's not just our medical devices.

22:23.400 --> 22:32.040
It's all kinds of things that are life and death. And then they understand that free software

22:32.040 --> 22:37.080
is there to help them to control their technology. Right. It's not all about ice cream and

22:37.720 --> 22:48.440
skateboard. Talking about add-ons. Very nice book, by the way. So there was this exception made.

22:49.240 --> 22:57.160
But how did other administrations or like, this is a digital act, but how did administrations

22:57.160 --> 23:02.200
in the US, especially the US Food and Drug Administration, who I know you have also talked to

23:02.840 --> 23:07.560
and reacted to this because this should be a topic that they care about. As you said,

23:07.560 --> 23:15.160
it's life or death. You would think. Yeah. No, I did have some early success with my advocacy at the

23:15.160 --> 23:23.080
FDA, where the head of cybersecurity at the FDA. And I had a very long conversation and that ended

23:23.080 --> 23:27.640
in a public conversation because we were on a panel together. And we continued some of the things

23:27.640 --> 23:34.280
that we were having privately, where in the middle of the panel, he said, oh, you know,

23:34.280 --> 23:40.360
well, first he said, the FDA is a small agency. We don't have the resources to vet the software

23:40.360 --> 23:48.200
on every single device. And then he stopped in the middle and he said, oh, actually, you're saying

23:48.200 --> 23:53.640
that we don't need to do that. You're saying that other people would like other other people,

23:53.640 --> 23:58.920
we don't even know would be doing that. And I was like, right. And he was like, that's very

23:58.920 --> 24:09.880
interesting. So we were having some early success, but ultimately, the process to publish these

24:09.880 --> 24:18.440
security guidelines, I don't want to say got away from us, but change the dialogues efficiently

24:18.440 --> 24:26.440
that everything about, it's a very conservative agency, understandably. So trying to shift the

24:26.440 --> 24:31.960
paradigm in terms of getting people to understand the way technology works and how free software could

24:31.960 --> 24:37.480
benefit this process, it's too theoretical for them to be able to embrace at the moment,

24:37.480 --> 24:42.040
because all of the device manufacturers are proprietary software. And they're saying, no, no,

24:42.040 --> 24:47.560
we need to keep it proprietary. So there's an opportunity for dialogue, but there's so much

24:49.240 --> 24:55.480
there's so many different issues that patients are advocating with the FDA and with regulators,

24:56.360 --> 25:03.400
that this is just one issue among many. And it becomes very difficult to get to really get any traction.

25:03.400 --> 25:08.440
And it's interesting because there is like one of us active in each of these spaces. So I'm

25:08.440 --> 25:14.760
obviously the software freedom medical device like advocate in the United States, but then

25:15.320 --> 25:19.320
there's another person who actually has my same heart condition, is only a few years older than

25:19.320 --> 25:24.120
me, and he has the same device that I, well, he had the same device I got a different one. But,

25:24.680 --> 25:30.520
but yeah, and he's advocating for patient access to data. And then there's so like there's

25:30.520 --> 25:35.960
a different person for each like little niche. And of course, ultimately at the end of the day,

25:36.520 --> 25:41.400
we're kind of ancillary to the process. It's completely messed up to think about it that way,

25:41.400 --> 25:46.920
but it's really the doctors and the device manufacturers who are control of this process.

25:46.920 --> 25:52.040
And the patients are just the people who have the devices. We're not the customer. Because we're

25:52.040 --> 25:56.040
not making any purchasing decisions. We're not choosing our brand of defibrillators. We're

25:56.040 --> 26:02.920
relying entirely on doctors. And also on day expert opinion. That's right. So it's a long road.

26:02.920 --> 26:09.800
I really thought that it would take just five years. And everyone would see that this like the

26:09.800 --> 26:15.880
truth of this issue. And we would come around. But it is, it is not easy at all. And I think the

26:15.880 --> 26:20.920
worst part about it is that is the standards component of it now, which is that, you know,

26:21.640 --> 26:26.120
there's not even the ability to use different equipment on different devices. So

26:26.920 --> 26:33.640
I needed to get my defibrillator read last week in New York. But because I have a defibrillator

26:33.640 --> 26:37.960
from a company that has a very, it's a large European company with a very small presence in the

26:37.960 --> 26:43.160
United States. I picked it because it's the only one that I could switch off the radio telemetry.

26:43.160 --> 26:48.360
And I've had threats due to the diversity and inclusion work that I do. So I just wanted to make

26:48.360 --> 26:54.440
sure, right, how are you doing? So I want, I don't want my device to be broadcasting remotely

26:54.440 --> 26:59.480
and vulnerable in that way. And so in order to get my information off my device, I have to go

26:59.480 --> 27:04.280
somewhere where there's a like a specialized piece of equipment. It's called a programmer

27:04.280 --> 27:10.680
to read the device. And there's one representative in New York City. And that representative

27:10.680 --> 27:16.840
was out of the country. And the company had no backup. Oh, no. And now admittedly, it was because

27:16.840 --> 27:21.640
I was leaving on Saturday. And this was Wednesday that I realized I needed to get this information

27:21.640 --> 27:28.840
before traveling to see if it was safe. But I couldn't do it. So I had to, I had to get it done

27:28.920 --> 27:35.000
in Brussels. They did. I went to the hospital. I did a little medical tourism. But it's how absurd is

27:35.000 --> 27:44.840
that? It is really, really absurd. You know, and it just none of our technology is stable in this

27:44.840 --> 27:51.080
way because we allow the companies to make their own products that don't interoperate or talk to

27:51.080 --> 27:55.560
any of the other equipment. And it's related to these issues around software freedom, but it's kind

27:55.560 --> 28:02.280
of like a separate dependence as well. Yeah, exactly. As much as I keep thinking, I figured out

28:02.600 --> 28:07.560
at least what the issues are. And then something else happens in my life. And it's a sudden,

28:09.320 --> 28:14.440
actually, I only, I only knew half of the issues before. I mean, you know, we all know that these

28:14.440 --> 28:20.840
are the issues. But when you experience them firsthand and you see the, the problematic outcomes

28:20.920 --> 28:30.520
from it, there's a company called Second Site, which started to, I think it actually declared bankruptcy.

28:30.520 --> 28:37.400
But it was an amazing company where there were, it was making eye implants and these retinal

28:37.400 --> 28:42.600
implants and people who had completely lost their vision who were completely blind could get these

28:42.600 --> 28:50.920
implants and see, not like see everything per se, but see enough where there's one woman

28:51.960 --> 28:58.520
who is a patient who gave an interview who said like, I remember the moment where I was changing

28:58.520 --> 29:07.080
trains in the subway. And all of a sudden, everything went dark. And I lost my vision again,

29:07.880 --> 29:12.920
right in the middle of my commute because the company was no longer issuing support

29:13.480 --> 29:19.320
for their devices. And she's, you know, the patients were out of luck because the company

29:19.960 --> 29:27.400
was VC funded and lost its resources. And now, those patients have useless

29:28.040 --> 29:33.000
implants in their body, which would be dangerous to remove. That could, that are completely

29:33.000 --> 29:38.600
functional. They could actually help them see if they could only be updated and maintained.

29:38.600 --> 29:43.720
So some people are maintaining them on their own or coming together or working with researchers

29:43.720 --> 29:48.200
to try to find like academics who might try to help them. So some of them are able to find,

29:48.200 --> 29:53.480
and it's not just that one company, it's several companies on multiple medical devices. And so

29:53.480 --> 29:58.440
intellectually, I thought, oh, that's so rough, you know, like that's what a horrible thing,

29:58.440 --> 30:03.560
literally people who could see who can't see anymore, but were the fact that we were able to

30:03.560 --> 30:08.200
have software freedom where we could work together and silently to improve that technology.

30:08.760 --> 30:13.240
And then it actually has happened to me. I think I'm going to have to get surgery

30:13.240 --> 30:21.960
to remove this medical device and get another one because if I can't get my information off

30:22.040 --> 30:28.200
of my device, how can I, how can I, if I can't talk to it, how can I count on it? And that was a

30:28.200 --> 30:33.400
very large manufacturer with a smaller presence in the United States, but still a significant presence

30:33.400 --> 30:38.760
that has now dwindled to almost nothing. It's, you know, it's the same, it's the same as the

30:38.760 --> 30:44.440
Twitter story, right? It's the same exact thing. Like companies are vulnerable to change of control.

30:44.440 --> 30:48.440
And you don't know whether your priorities will be their priorities.

30:48.520 --> 30:54.360
Sorry, we just had a break. We're at a conference, so people are walking by.

30:54.360 --> 31:01.720
Yeah, that's true. So when we're talking about this problem with companies and what happens to

31:01.720 --> 31:06.600
if the company, for example, goes bankrupt, there was an article in nature about this.

31:07.400 --> 31:12.200
That's exactly what I'm referring to. The nature article summarizes it nicely. So there are

31:12.200 --> 31:17.240
a few articles about the second-side situation and the nature article brings in a few other devices as

31:17.240 --> 31:21.720
well. It's definitely worth a read. I don't know if you do show notes or anything like that.

31:21.720 --> 31:27.480
Yeah, I would put it in the show notes, so people can go to it and take a look at it.

31:30.680 --> 31:36.440
Thank you so much for talking about this to me because it is quite a complex topic,

31:37.240 --> 31:43.160
but I would get the feeling that there's also a bit of progress. Would you say that as well or

31:43.240 --> 31:47.320
what's your feeding point of future about this? I think there's definitely progress. So I think

31:47.320 --> 31:52.920
that the work that we've seen in the insulin pump space, so I think the fact that so many people

31:52.920 --> 31:59.000
have benefited from having control over their insulin pumps. So what the insulin pump patients

31:59.000 --> 32:04.760
were doing was they were taking old insulin pumps that actually had a security vulnerability on them

32:04.760 --> 32:09.320
that allowed for interference, and they were using that security vulnerability

32:09.320 --> 32:14.040
but to provide more precise treatment for themselves, and they were able to introduce what they

32:14.040 --> 32:21.480
call a closed loop system of insulin delivery, which helps, seems to help most people, but especially

32:21.480 --> 32:29.400
kids who are diabetic. So it was really like, if there's so many inspiring stories, and because

32:29.400 --> 32:36.360
it's been so successful, I think that the device manufacturers are more open to talking about it now

32:36.360 --> 32:41.480
because there's years worth of data of patients having successful outcomes, and they call it the

32:41.480 --> 32:45.640
we're not waiting movement because they're not waiting for the device manufacturers to come to

32:45.640 --> 32:50.520
these conclusions and to be able to provide that kind of treatment. So I think there's that,

32:50.520 --> 32:55.560
and then I think that also the fact that we've seen vulnerabilities across the board,

32:56.360 --> 33:02.920
right, where devices that are closed and proprietary are also vulnerable, that people are

33:02.920 --> 33:08.360
starting to really understand fundamentally the truths about software security. So I do think

33:08.360 --> 33:13.080
that things are changing in a positive way. I still think that especially in the United States,

33:13.080 --> 33:19.000
I don't know how it is in Europe, although it seems similar for my device interrogation,

33:19.000 --> 33:24.200
most people don't consider the patient, like the patients that are not really, they're very

33:24.200 --> 33:29.240
generally quite passive in terms of what devices they get and how they use them, and I think that

33:29.240 --> 33:34.760
that's one of the ways in which is changing too, as people get devices that are more technically

33:34.760 --> 33:42.520
savvy. I mean, most of the device, most of the patient advocates that I'm aware of are like younger

33:42.520 --> 33:49.720
people, I think I can still say that younger people like me, I'm still far from 65 at least,

33:51.080 --> 33:56.440
not as young as I was when I got my certificate later, but yeah, at that point people would say,

33:56.440 --> 34:03.080
you're so young, and now they're like, you're young. And we're like, oh, I thought only really old

34:03.080 --> 34:12.360
people had, anyway. But yeah, so I think that as more technical people get these devices, they

34:12.360 --> 34:17.320
ask more informed questions, and they're able to advocate for themselves and other patients,

34:17.320 --> 34:22.440
and so I think that is changing, and I think there's opportunity, and I think it's on the upswing,

34:23.240 --> 34:29.000
it's just that like everything else around software freedom, the changes that we need to make

34:29.000 --> 34:37.960
are so big that they really require large societal investment. Bradley Kuhn, who I work with,

34:37.960 --> 34:43.160
who founded Software Freedom Conservancy with me, likes to say, everything is politically

34:43.160 --> 34:48.600
unviable until the moment that it is not. And that's exactly what's happening now, where people

34:48.600 --> 34:54.200
are waking up to this issue, and it previously had been something that politicians and other people

34:55.640 --> 35:01.480
had trouble understanding, and certainly we're not interested in prioritizing. And now that the

35:01.480 --> 35:06.200
everyday person is worried about the ethics of their technology, they're starting to wake up.

35:07.160 --> 35:13.720
Yeah, it's changing, it's changing in every corner, and it's not just Twitter, and the Twitter

35:13.720 --> 35:19.000
users moving to Macedonia, and it's also that the understanding of technology and how important it

35:19.000 --> 35:27.480
is in our lives is changing, and how much we rely on it. Yes, it's across the board. I like the

35:27.480 --> 35:33.800
Twitter example just because so many people took action, so I like that. It's just that it's like

35:33.800 --> 35:40.600
an example that I think we can see in other spaces, and it was also unusual because we were so ready

35:40.680 --> 35:46.200
with an alternative that worked. So there was a place for people to go. So I think we're going to

35:46.200 --> 35:53.400
see a lot more of that. I hope so too. Last question. As you know, we have the I Love Free Software Day.

35:53.400 --> 35:59.720
On this day, we read out to people who work very hard for free software throughout the year. And

36:00.600 --> 36:06.440
we say thank you to them. We say thank you for all the work they have done over the last year

36:06.520 --> 36:12.040
for free software, because it's quite a lot, as you know, you have to fix bugs, you have to deal

36:12.040 --> 36:18.280
with issues, you have to improve software. So I was wondering if there's a project or a person

36:18.280 --> 36:23.960
that you would like to say thank you to. It's a theme from what I have done what I said earlier today,

36:23.960 --> 36:30.120
but at the moment, I really want to thank Matthias, because I think that that book is really just

36:30.120 --> 36:37.000
such a wonderful step towards making people understand about software freedom. Like I love it.

36:37.000 --> 36:42.920
I mean, he runs the FSFE and does such a wonderful job. And all of you that work there are like,

36:42.920 --> 36:49.640
you work so hard and you make such great, like I love public money, public code. And you know,

36:50.440 --> 36:54.200
software freedom conservancy, we're a global organization, but we do have a particular

36:54.280 --> 37:00.440
US focus. And it's such a relief to have an organization doing such a good job in Europe. And so

37:00.440 --> 37:06.120
I'm like, we're at FASM. And so we've been working, especially with FSFE folks to run the legal

37:06.120 --> 37:11.320
and policy dev room. And as I said earlier, our stands are right next to each other. So it feels like

37:11.320 --> 37:15.880
like there's a lot of progress, but I'm so grateful for all of you at FSFE, really. Thank you so

37:15.880 --> 37:24.840
much for your work. Thank you. Oh, my God. Very nice. Oh, God. Thank you so much for your time.

37:24.840 --> 37:29.640
And thank you for joining me in the software freedom podcast. Thank you. I really loved it. If

37:29.640 --> 37:35.880
people want to find out more, our site is sfconservancy.org. If you or someone you know is subject to

37:35.880 --> 37:41.080
systemic bias or underrepresentation, Outreachee is paid remote internships, which might be a great

37:41.080 --> 37:47.240
opportunity for you. Please consider that. That's outreachee.org. And help us spread the word about

37:47.240 --> 37:51.720
software freedom. We're making so much progress. And you listeners, you're like, you're a big part of

37:51.720 --> 37:56.680
this. And I'm going to put all the links in the show note. Fantastic. Thanks so much. Thank you so

37:56.680 --> 38:02.520
much, Karen. Bye, bye. Bye. This was the software freedom podcast. If you liked this episode,

38:02.520 --> 38:07.480
please recommend it to your friends and rate it. Also subscribe to make sure you will get the next

38:08.440 --> 38:12.360
episode. This podcast was presented to you by the Free Software Foundation Europe. We are

38:12.360 --> 38:18.280
charity that empowers users to control technology. If you would like to support us in our work,

38:18.280 --> 38:36.440
please go to fsfe.org slash donate.

Back to the episode SFP#19