Say no to locked-down devices that limit our freedom to install apps and switch operating systems. Say yes to device neutrality, which ensures that we control our own hardware! Your device, your choice! Support our demand for the right to install any software on our devices.

Transcript of SFP#24: The status of Free Software with Karen Sandler and Alexander Sander

Back to the episode SFP#24

This is a transcript created with the Free Software tool Whisper. For more information and feedback reach out to podcast@fsfe.org

WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:19.000
Welcome to the software freedom podcast.

00:19.000 --> 00:21.800
This podcast is brought to you by the Free Software Foundation Europe,

00:21.800 --> 00:25.440
we are a charity that empowers users to control technology.

00:25.440 --> 00:28.880
I'm Bonnie Merring and for this I love Free Software Day podcasts.

00:28.880 --> 00:30.400
I have two guests with me.

00:30.400 --> 00:34.960
I have Karen Sandlam from the Software Freedom Conservancy.

00:34.960 --> 00:37.840
And Karen brings an engineering and legal background,

00:37.840 --> 00:43.200
has been around for the software for ages, and also a personal interest.

00:43.200 --> 00:45.720
Bonnie just called me old, is it okay to interrupt her?

00:45.720 --> 00:50.640
Yeah, it's okay, I'm sorry.

00:50.640 --> 00:53.480
It's quite alright, that's what Free Software is about.

00:53.480 --> 00:55.560
It's about people who have been here for a long time

00:55.560 --> 00:57.320
and people who are newcomers.

00:57.320 --> 01:05.640
Karen brings an engineering and legal background, as well as a personal interest.

01:05.640 --> 01:16.440
Someone with an implemented pacemaker, she also has a real personal interest in it.

01:16.440 --> 01:22.040
And our second guest for this podcast for the I Love Free Software Day is Alexander Sander.

01:22.120 --> 01:27.160
Alex is also around for ages with the Free Software movement.

01:27.160 --> 01:29.320
You're old too.

01:29.320 --> 01:34.120
No, I just wanted to say it because I felt like this is a good equal level.

01:34.120 --> 01:37.600
Alex is way older than me.

01:37.600 --> 01:42.280
Our second guest for this I Love Free Software Day podcast is Alexander Sander.

01:42.280 --> 01:45.360
He's the FSEP Senior Policy Consultant.

01:45.360 --> 01:49.280
And Alex has been around with Free Software for a very long time.

01:49.280 --> 01:52.880
He's also since ever.

01:52.880 --> 02:01.040
Like when Free Software started in 1837, Alex Sander was here.

02:01.040 --> 02:02.760
Oh gosh.

02:05.160 --> 02:07.200
Okay, I think we have to start again.

02:07.200 --> 02:09.520
No, that's not right.

02:09.520 --> 02:10.680
Sitting next to me.

02:10.680 --> 02:12.760
Okay, I won't say anything about it.

02:12.760 --> 02:14.280
Long time on.

02:14.280 --> 02:25.600
All right, thank you, too, for joining me here for the Software Freedom podcast.

02:25.600 --> 02:29.040
And yeah, thank you so much for making the time at FOSSTEM.

02:29.040 --> 02:30.840
We're currently at FOSSTEM, actually.

02:30.840 --> 02:32.560
I found a really quiet room here.

02:32.560 --> 02:34.000
I can't believe that I managed.

02:34.000 --> 02:35.000
That's true.

02:35.000 --> 02:36.000
It's a very cool room.

02:36.000 --> 02:37.280
I can't believe you did this, either.

02:37.280 --> 02:43.760
I apologize to everybody that I have a little bit of a cold, so you heard that in my voice.

02:44.480 --> 02:47.360
You're also organizing a death room here, right?

02:47.360 --> 02:48.360
That's true.

02:48.360 --> 02:52.520
It will happen basically after the podcast, so we can't tell you how it was.

02:52.520 --> 02:55.160
No, we're going to run straight there from here.

02:55.160 --> 03:00.240
But you can definitely read on our websites afterwards how it was and can see the recordings

03:00.240 --> 03:04.560
because we will have also awesome recordings, and by that we can also follow in the death

03:04.560 --> 03:07.200
room, even if you're not around.

03:07.200 --> 03:11.640
And unfortunately, we just got a half day for this year's FOSSTEM, but still I think

03:11.640 --> 03:13.840
we got a very interesting program.

03:13.840 --> 03:17.000
Freddie, I was thinking, fortunately, we have only a half day.

03:17.000 --> 03:23.000
I mean, it's a very interesting program, but we've basically, it's a very busy FOSSTEM.

03:23.000 --> 03:26.480
I did a keynote this morning about outreach.

03:26.480 --> 03:32.400
Bradley has a keynote, a main track talk this afternoon, and then we have the legal death

03:32.400 --> 03:33.960
room, and there's just tons going on.

03:33.960 --> 03:39.680
And I know you're super, we had a hard time finding the schedule for this because of how

03:39.680 --> 03:40.680
busy everybody was.

03:40.720 --> 03:41.720
Yeah.

03:41.720 --> 03:42.720
Oh, no.

03:42.720 --> 03:46.720
I mean, it's always this like between the years coming up with the agenda, but I mean,

03:46.720 --> 03:52.240
we are now kind of used to it as we, it's not the first time, but still it's, yeah,

03:52.240 --> 03:53.240
it's always challenging.

03:53.240 --> 03:58.840
And I think we have like small changes until the last minute, but still.

03:58.840 --> 04:01.280
I think it's been very like, I think the program's really strong.

04:01.280 --> 04:07.200
We got more strong applications than we have in a lot of years, so it's a shame we can't

04:07.240 --> 04:12.200
have all of them, but I think in future years, we'll have, we'll be able to have some of

04:12.200 --> 04:13.200
that programming.

04:13.200 --> 04:14.200
So it's all good.

04:14.200 --> 04:19.040
Is there a talk you really would recommend to go there or?

04:19.040 --> 04:24.800
I mean, for me, it's important to like follow the debates around the whole liability and

04:24.800 --> 04:33.200
AI act debates we had, but also on interoperability that kept me and Lina busy for a very long

04:33.200 --> 04:34.200
time.

04:34.200 --> 04:35.200
So I think we'll.

04:35.200 --> 04:36.200
That's why I'm so old.

04:36.200 --> 04:39.080
I think we'll be covering it in the hot topics in the dev room.

04:39.080 --> 04:43.400
I think that's probably the, like if you were to pick one thing, it will probably cover

04:43.400 --> 04:48.840
like an overview of all of the talks that, like all of the topics that are really like

04:48.840 --> 04:49.840
current.

04:49.840 --> 04:50.840
Yeah.

04:50.840 --> 04:51.840
All right.

04:51.840 --> 04:53.640
This brings me basically to our topic.

04:53.640 --> 04:58.600
As you mentioned, liability, AI act, it's a very broad topic, so it's about the status

04:58.600 --> 05:02.000
of what a current situation of free software in the Western world.

05:02.000 --> 05:08.960
I know it has a Western world point of view with you from the USA and Alex basically from

05:08.960 --> 05:10.460
Europe.

05:10.460 --> 05:18.320
So last year, this is how I came up with the idea actually last year, you mentioned to me,

05:18.320 --> 05:23.640
you had the feeling that something was happening that free software is getting stronger and

05:23.640 --> 05:25.800
that it's more widely accepted.

05:25.800 --> 05:31.880
And this was shortly after Elon Musk took over ex formerly known as Twitter.

05:32.760 --> 05:33.760
That's how they presented now.

05:33.760 --> 05:34.760
Is there a connection?

05:34.760 --> 05:35.760
No.

05:35.760 --> 05:40.960
And a lot of people moved to Amsterdam and you really had the feeling that something

05:40.960 --> 05:43.040
was happening, right?

05:43.040 --> 05:47.640
Is it still like that or how would you say the last year has gone from Europe?

05:47.640 --> 05:48.640
I mean, absolutely.

05:48.640 --> 05:55.800
I mean, like free software is, it's a long-term issue and so our movement is constantly in

05:55.800 --> 06:00.200
a state of like highs and lows and it's like that forever and we just have to like stay

06:00.200 --> 06:05.280
focused and really think long-term because software freedom is something that is like,

06:05.280 --> 06:10.880
you know, not just this year, not just next year, but we have to think in terms of decades

06:10.880 --> 06:16.120
and even a century, like we have to be laying the groundwork and I do find that I'm still

06:16.120 --> 06:21.600
in a place of optimism when it comes to like the feeling like things are changing.

06:21.600 --> 06:27.840
I think seeing how that move to Amsterdam was not just an isolated blip, the people

06:27.840 --> 06:34.760
have continued to move and more than that, there's just this ever-growing belief that

06:34.760 --> 06:39.880
there's a problem with relying on big tech solutions and ordinary people are willing

06:39.880 --> 06:45.160
to suddenly say, oh, you know, I guess that Facebook thing isn't so good.

06:45.160 --> 06:49.200
Oh, yeah, I know that Apple has a lot of control over my computing.

06:49.200 --> 06:51.240
I don't know if I feel like comfortable about it.

06:51.240 --> 06:54.560
You know, I remember when you were talking about this weird thing about controlling my

06:54.560 --> 06:59.320
software years ago, Karen, like, I really see that there's a point to that.

06:59.320 --> 07:02.280
I don't know if you've been seeing the same thing.

07:02.280 --> 07:10.400
I mean, I'm also seeing it on a wider level when it comes to government implementing open

07:10.400 --> 07:14.520
source of free software solutions and it's interesting to see that they connected to

07:14.520 --> 07:20.320
serenity and we have a very huge debate about digital serenity and part of this is like

07:20.320 --> 07:24.960
hosting the data under your control, but also we talk about free software.

07:24.960 --> 07:28.440
And that's super interesting to see that governments like connect this debate and also

07:28.440 --> 07:34.240
won't like what we as an individual won't have like control access, transparency.

07:34.240 --> 07:38.640
That's obviously also something that governments are looking for these days and that's also

07:38.640 --> 07:42.840
something I just mentioned in the beginning with the Interoperability Europe Act or the

07:42.840 --> 07:46.880
discussion about interoperability in general and that's also something we have on our legal

07:46.920 --> 07:49.640
death room with Matthias Stömer from Switzerland.

07:49.640 --> 07:54.680
So it's the procurement of free software done by governments and they also see that

07:54.680 --> 07:58.400
interoperability is very important for them and that they can only achieve it if they

07:58.400 --> 08:02.200
have access to the source code and if they can change it.

08:02.200 --> 08:06.120
If they have access to free software, like if they use free software.

08:06.120 --> 08:10.400
I think what's upon a time in the free software world, we used to talk about like really talk

08:10.400 --> 08:14.080
about the issue from a real developer perspective that developers should have the right and

08:14.120 --> 08:20.080
I think that's still the case, you know, and that's the like the kernel for which this

08:20.080 --> 08:21.640
movement started.

08:21.640 --> 08:25.720
But what we're now starting to talk about is more like collective action and whether

08:25.720 --> 08:30.360
that's through governments, through nonprofits or through other kinds of mechanisms, having

08:30.360 --> 08:34.600
that ability so that technical and non-technical people can act at concert to have appreciable

08:34.600 --> 08:36.400
control over their technology.

08:36.400 --> 08:40.960
Like we're seeing that conversation for the first time and for the first time, I feel

08:40.960 --> 08:47.800
like we're able to start proposing really big solutions instead of small, you know,

08:47.800 --> 08:49.520
tiny move-the-needle solutions.

08:49.520 --> 08:50.640
So I don't know.

08:50.640 --> 08:52.120
Do you have an example?

08:52.120 --> 08:54.320
Um, no.

08:54.320 --> 08:56.000
Why would I have an example?

08:56.000 --> 08:57.960
No, I would say from the US perspective.

08:57.960 --> 09:01.720
Well, just to meet the counter to what Alex was saying, the US, it's more about seeing

09:01.720 --> 09:06.760
right to repair legislation popping up everywhere across the United States, not everywhere.

09:06.760 --> 09:09.720
But in quite a few prominent jurisdictions.

09:09.760 --> 09:15.200
And so people are sort of saying, you know, it's a part of our culture that we should

09:15.200 --> 09:17.400
be able to repair the technology we rely on.

09:17.400 --> 09:23.560
I mean, you know, you both are a European base, but as you may know from the like the

09:23.560 --> 09:26.920
reputation of Americans, what's more American than repairing your car?

09:26.920 --> 09:31.240
And when your car is all software, how are you going to repair your car?

09:31.240 --> 09:36.160
And so Americans are sort of starting to wake up to that and like, you know, the I fix it

09:36.160 --> 09:40.200
folks and the right to repair folks, they're done a really good job of starting to propose

09:40.200 --> 09:41.360
all this legislation.

09:41.360 --> 09:45.040
And we've been excited to be a part of the like software right to repair and helping

09:45.040 --> 09:50.640
them to understand how, you know, well, John Deere, like John Deere tractors, they, you

09:50.640 --> 09:53.000
know, they have copy-lefted software in them.

09:53.000 --> 09:54.840
And that means that there are software rights.

09:54.840 --> 10:00.640
And so the linking that software right to the hardware right to repair, I think is starting

10:00.640 --> 10:04.160
to happen in a lot of places and I'm really gratified to see it.

10:04.160 --> 10:08.120
This was also a focus of your work last year, right?

10:08.120 --> 10:09.120
The right to repair.

10:09.120 --> 10:15.160
It was like a, you were very focused on this as well with the DMCA, I think it's called.

10:15.160 --> 10:16.160
Yeah.

10:16.160 --> 10:17.160
Yeah.

10:17.160 --> 10:18.160
Yeah.

10:18.160 --> 10:20.520
But it has been around for ages now.

10:20.520 --> 10:22.160
It's the worst.

10:22.160 --> 10:23.160
Did something happen there?

10:23.160 --> 10:28.000
Was it like in the last year, did you have the feeling that you actually with this broader

10:28.000 --> 10:30.640
alliance that you formed could move something?

10:30.640 --> 10:33.880
Well, I does feel that way because, you know, we're sort of fed up.

10:33.880 --> 10:38.280
So the way that it's worked in the United States is that the digital millennium, the

10:38.280 --> 10:44.280
DMCA, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, prevents folks from like circumventing technological

10:44.280 --> 10:46.640
protection measures, basically DRM.

10:46.640 --> 10:52.440
So it's a crime to try to circumvent those technological protection measures.

10:52.440 --> 10:54.000
And that's really awful.

10:54.000 --> 10:58.160
And so what the, what they copyrighted, what they did in the legislation is they established

10:58.160 --> 10:59.320
this every three years.

10:59.320 --> 11:03.840
There's this triennial exemption period where you can say, no, no, no, no, no.

11:03.840 --> 11:08.880
I need an exemption for being able to circumvent myself because I have these important causes.

11:08.880 --> 11:14.760
And so independently, a lot of groups over the years have been submitting for their exemptions.

11:14.760 --> 11:19.560
We at Software Freedom Conservancy applied for router, exemptions for routers, for smart

11:19.560 --> 11:26.000
TVs in order to be able to determine if somebody is violating your copyrights and violating

11:26.000 --> 11:27.000
the GPL.

11:27.000 --> 11:32.300
And, and I've been involved with the medical devices once so that you could circumvent technological

11:32.300 --> 11:33.300
protection measures.

11:33.300 --> 11:34.940
But, and that's been pretty successful.

11:34.940 --> 11:39.980
The Copyright Office has granted those permissions, but those only go so far as you be able to

11:39.980 --> 11:43.820
circumvent yourself, like do that work yourself.

11:43.820 --> 11:50.540
It is still absolutely illegal under any circumstances to talk about it and explain and teach to others,

11:50.540 --> 11:51.540
which is absurd.

11:51.540 --> 11:55.580
And so one of the things that happened this year is that our coalition of right to repair

11:55.580 --> 12:02.180
groups came together and we wrote an amicus brief, basically saying that it's unconstitutional

12:02.180 --> 12:03.060
in the United States.

12:03.060 --> 12:08.060
It violates free speech to not, you know, so we haven't seen any results on that yet.

12:08.060 --> 12:11.700
It's just, we just filed it in December, you're saying it was.

12:11.700 --> 12:12.860
I think so.

12:12.860 --> 12:16.940
But what was cool about that was that like it really was coming out of the people who

12:16.940 --> 12:18.940
are more focused on hardware.

12:18.940 --> 12:24.740
And yet they included my medical devices story in the, like, like prominently in the brief,

12:24.740 --> 12:29.420
just to explain as a, and used our examples for why this, why the software right to repair

12:29.420 --> 12:30.500
is so critical.

12:30.500 --> 12:34.820
So, you know, I don't know, have we seen any real result yet?

12:34.820 --> 12:36.300
It's hard to say.

12:36.300 --> 12:41.140
But like the fact that we're working more in concert and that the folks that we're advocating

12:41.140 --> 12:45.380
to a more receptive to it, means that we're really onto something good and I'm hoping

12:45.380 --> 12:47.100
that we're really see some results.

12:47.100 --> 12:51.820
I would say in the next year, but I think that's overly optimistic in the next few years.

12:51.820 --> 12:52.820
But how is this working out?

12:52.820 --> 12:58.900
It's like, it sounds like that you managed it to, to like connect different communities.

12:58.900 --> 13:02.460
So in Germany, for example, we have this movement called bits and boimers, which is

13:02.460 --> 13:07.220
basically bits and trees that we tried to bring in climate and digital right activists

13:07.220 --> 13:09.540
in one room and discuss basically these topics.

13:09.540 --> 13:10.940
Is it the same for you?

13:10.940 --> 13:11.940
That's really cool.

13:11.940 --> 13:12.940
Yeah.

13:12.940 --> 13:15.500
What kind of communities are discussing these topics in the US?

13:15.500 --> 13:16.500
Yeah.

13:16.500 --> 13:20.300
I mean, it's so I have to give my colleague Denver, a lot of Denver Gigerich, a lot of

13:20.300 --> 13:24.740
credit because he's basically been helping to bring these, these organizations together.

13:24.740 --> 13:30.620
And so he participates in monthly calls with, with mostly like hardware focused organizations,

13:30.620 --> 13:33.180
but there is a variety of organizations that participate.

13:33.180 --> 13:37.940
Some of them have a real environmental viewpoint because the right to repair really resonates

13:37.940 --> 13:41.420
with your desire to not put more equipment in landfills, right?

13:41.420 --> 13:45.100
If you could replace the software and if you could repair it, then there's a real environmental

13:45.100 --> 13:47.820
impact if you could scale that.

13:47.820 --> 13:51.340
So yeah, I mean, I think we're seeing something similar.

13:51.340 --> 13:58.300
I think we also discussed on the, during the SFS con in Bolzano, the blue angel, I think

13:58.300 --> 14:01.540
called a logo to put on the software.

14:01.540 --> 14:07.260
And that's, I think it's also interesting this discussion we also have in Europe to,

14:07.260 --> 14:12.420
to combine climate and, and software basically and to discuss basically if you can see the

14:12.420 --> 14:16.980
source code, you can make it more efficient and but that's can safeguard resources and

14:16.980 --> 14:20.500
also as you don't have to reinvent the wheel over and over again, right?

14:20.660 --> 14:22.620
So this is, I mean, we can also save energy with this.

14:22.620 --> 14:27.900
So I also think it's a debate which will keep us busy for the next decades as well.

14:27.900 --> 14:30.100
Well, so Bonnie asked me about my optimism, right?

14:30.100 --> 14:33.820
Like whether I'm still as optimistic as I was last year.

14:34.820 --> 14:38.700
No, but I was going to ask you like what your feeling is about all the legislation that's

14:38.700 --> 14:42.180
been coming down in Europe and, you know, like what's your perspective on it?

14:42.180 --> 14:46.260
How do you feel about it now that like every, everything is finalizing, right?

14:46.700 --> 14:50.900
Oh, before that, could you also mention all those legislation that are coming?

14:50.900 --> 14:53.700
Because I think otherwise we will get a bit lost.

14:53.700 --> 14:56.900
There are a lot of acts currently happening and files.

14:57.180 --> 14:58.300
Yeah, that's pretty true.

14:58.300 --> 15:03.500
So basically what we, what we are discussing or what we had discussed in Europe for the

15:03.500 --> 15:13.260
last basically years is how can we exempt free software from legislation when we want

15:13.260 --> 15:17.220
to like put the burden on those earning money with it.

15:17.220 --> 15:24.860
So and, but at the same time making sure we don't over-regulate and by thus we want to

15:24.860 --> 15:26.580
safeguard free software development.

15:26.580 --> 15:30.540
That's basically what we are trying to achieve in this legislation and what worked out quite

15:30.540 --> 15:31.220
well, I'd say.

15:31.700 --> 15:34.340
And the files have been called Cyber Resilience Act.

15:34.980 --> 15:41.540
Basically we discussed to put a CE label on software with this file and in this case for

15:41.580 --> 15:45.660
cybersecurity, then we are talking about the product liability directive.

15:45.660 --> 15:47.220
This is pretty much the same idea.

15:47.220 --> 15:53.260
So we want to put a CE label on software and the third file, which was discussed, which

15:53.260 --> 15:55.780
is going in this direction was the AI Act.

15:55.820 --> 16:02.900
We also want to have a CE label for AI, but ultimately the AI Act also talked about

16:02.900 --> 16:05.300
language models and high risk models and stuff like this.

16:05.300 --> 16:10.300
So there have been the Cyber Resilience Act and AI Act have been like topic wise a bit

16:10.300 --> 16:14.140
different, but in general we were talking about putting a CE label on software.

16:14.140 --> 16:15.740
So that's basically what we discussed.

16:15.740 --> 16:20.780
And I think I can understand the idea from a European perspective.

16:20.780 --> 16:25.300
So everything that comes to the European market needs to have this label and we had

16:25.300 --> 16:29.980
good experience, especially when we talked about toys, for example, that we can make

16:29.980 --> 16:37.940
sure that we save our children from products that might don't follow like the product

16:37.980 --> 16:38.940
rules we had in place.

16:39.260 --> 16:44.260
And that was the idea basically by lawmakers to have safe software.

16:44.260 --> 16:49.380
No, let's not discuss how useful.

16:49.740 --> 16:53.660
Yeah, no, it's a totally different topic, but that's the general take on this.

16:53.660 --> 16:53.980
Exactly.

16:53.980 --> 16:57.180
That was the general aim with this legislation.

16:57.180 --> 17:05.020
And what we tried to do is that the legislator came up with a wording set like we want to

17:05.020 --> 17:07.940
put things into service or put on to market.

17:07.940 --> 17:12.620
That was like from the one wording and the other one was talking about commercial activity.

17:13.340 --> 17:18.420
And it's super difficult to like go with these terms when we talk about free software.

17:18.420 --> 17:20.580
So just think about foundations, for example.

17:20.580 --> 17:26.220
So they definitely have like a revenue, but is this then a commercial activity in terms

17:26.220 --> 17:31.780
of like do you contribute to like the social good and then you are liable for this because

17:31.780 --> 17:37.660
you are just like, yeah, I'm giving people a difficult situation also.

17:38.140 --> 17:39.580
Definitely, definitely it was.

17:39.580 --> 17:46.060
And but I do believe like with the discussion we had, we also managed it to explain free

17:46.060 --> 17:48.180
software and not to decision makers in the last year.

17:48.180 --> 17:53.300
And it also helped a lot to make them understand how the whole ecosystem looks like and how

17:53.300 --> 17:54.060
it's working.

17:54.060 --> 17:58.860
And they are also now coming to foster them, for example, and want to run into people and

17:58.860 --> 17:59.700
learn more about it.

17:59.700 --> 18:03.460
So and that's also a good result of people from the European Commission, from the European

18:03.460 --> 18:07.740
Parliament and the council are going to a conference like the foster to learn more about

18:07.740 --> 18:08.740
what they are regulating.

18:09.060 --> 18:15.100
And I think that's something we should also encourage and like look that we not only talk

18:15.100 --> 18:21.140
to us, but that we also like do outreach activities and try to explain free software

18:21.140 --> 18:24.380
to people that are not so much aware about these topics.

18:24.380 --> 18:28.260
And I do believe that this worked out very, very well with this discussion we had in the

18:28.260 --> 18:28.740
last year.

18:28.940 --> 18:29.820
So you're optimistic.

18:30.300 --> 18:31.980
Yeah, that was now my question as well.

18:31.980 --> 18:34.100
So how is your optimism feel now?

18:37.020 --> 18:43.100
I mean, I was quite optimistic already, I think last year that so because the thing is we had

18:43.100 --> 18:47.220
it already in the Commission already proposed the exemption, which is good.

18:47.220 --> 18:52.460
So the exemption itself was not good, but they already had in mind that they have to

18:52.460 --> 18:54.260
regulate it somehow differently.

18:54.260 --> 18:55.980
And that that was a good starting point.

18:56.980 --> 19:00.500
And not everything was super nice and shiny.

19:00.500 --> 19:03.500
And I do believe we also have to clean up the mess a bit.

19:04.100 --> 19:09.860
So to say in the next month, I think it's also good that we are going for a next term so

19:09.860 --> 19:14.580
that everything renews a bit, also in the institutions, but also maybe we have the time

19:14.580 --> 19:23.940
to reflect a bit in our movement, how we should like jump into future debates and how

19:23.940 --> 19:27.580
we maybe could better collaborate also as community.

19:28.580 --> 19:33.860
This is definitely something where we need to invest some time to discuss all of this.

19:33.860 --> 19:40.580
But in general, I'd say we can all be quite happy what we achieved in total.

19:40.580 --> 19:41.340
It's not perfect.

19:41.340 --> 19:42.260
It's far from perfect.

19:42.780 --> 19:47.420
Also, it's absolutely not fully clear how it will look like in reality.

19:47.420 --> 19:52.540
I mean, it's always the case with legislation that you will not fully know how it will like

19:52.540 --> 19:54.020
then look in five years.

19:54.020 --> 19:55.860
And maybe we need to adapt the rules then.

19:56.580 --> 20:03.060
So we definitely need to monitor a lot of guidelines or delegated acts.

20:03.380 --> 20:09.260
So basically to say decisions that have to be taken in the future by the European Commission,

20:09.260 --> 20:11.780
for example, and this is definitely something we need to monitor.

20:12.420 --> 20:18.180
But in general, what we have now and also what we discussed is something we can reuse

20:18.180 --> 20:21.500
for future debates and we can build on the wording we have.

20:21.540 --> 20:22.540
And that's something good.

20:23.300 --> 20:29.340
So you would say there in the last year, Christopher made a step forward because now

20:29.340 --> 20:37.980
it's more widely known and there is some groundwork done again and we can continue from here.

20:37.980 --> 20:47.420
I do believe when you look on this governmental level, then I'd say it pretty much started

20:47.460 --> 20:54.300
with these corona tracing apps when governments understood in practice how cross-border collaboration

20:54.300 --> 21:00.860
looks like and how you can do this procurement of basically free software, which is super easy

21:00.860 --> 21:08.140
because you just take it from, in this case, Germany and do a translation and then you

21:08.140 --> 21:10.500
can have a cross-border app and use it everywhere.

21:10.500 --> 21:14.500
And this is a moment where governments understood, oh, this is really cool and we want to have

21:14.500 --> 21:15.500
this as well.

21:15.500 --> 21:19.620
Then the debate about digital sovereignty that also contributes to this.

21:19.620 --> 21:24.380
We have governments procuring more and more free software, thus we have also more and

21:24.380 --> 21:26.260
more best practice examples.

21:26.260 --> 21:31.540
And we had this debate around liability and the AI Act and also with the large language

21:31.540 --> 21:37.460
models we talked a lot about free software and that helped that people better understand

21:37.460 --> 21:38.460
free software.

21:38.460 --> 21:41.140
And this, I think, also leads to better regulation.

21:41.300 --> 21:47.380
It's way better if you know what you are regulating than if you are doing it by, I'm not fully

21:47.380 --> 21:48.780
sure, but I'm going to regulate.

21:48.780 --> 21:49.780
Yeah.

21:49.780 --> 21:55.500
I mean, lest everything sound like sunshine and roses, I would say that in the pandemic,

21:55.500 --> 22:02.420
it was really disappointing how many proprietary solutions were settled on widely by big sections

22:02.420 --> 22:03.420
of society.

22:04.180 --> 22:13.660
In the United States, the software used for COVID tracking and other things was proprietary.

22:13.660 --> 22:19.340
There were a lot of disappointing developments, but nonetheless, I still, I agree with you

22:19.340 --> 22:20.340
otherwise.

22:20.340 --> 22:24.420
I mean, I think we continue to push things forward and we're always working for that

22:24.420 --> 22:25.420
next opportunity.

22:25.420 --> 22:30.820
Bradley, who I work with, Bradley Kuhn who works with me at Software Freedom Conservancy

22:30.860 --> 22:35.100
says, we're working for Software Freedom in 300 years.

22:35.100 --> 22:40.980
We're laying the groundwork now so that later people could come back and they have the ideological

22:40.980 --> 22:45.060
underpinnings and they have a map and they can look at the failures and they can look

22:45.060 --> 22:47.900
at how things unraveled and they could rebuild in a sensible way.

22:47.900 --> 22:53.100
I don't know that I'm willing to give up on Software Freedom in my lifetime, but it's

22:53.100 --> 22:55.420
very difficult to live only in Software Freedom now.

22:55.420 --> 23:01.700
It's impossible if you have to do things for yourself like book of flight.

23:01.700 --> 23:03.100
It's very difficult to do.

23:03.100 --> 23:08.580
I think we have to be sanguine about the challenges that we are facing, which are considerable,

23:08.580 --> 23:14.140
but the opportunities to present these issues as ones that are societal issues and to get

23:14.140 --> 23:18.980
legislators and other public-facing people to care about it is so much greater than it

23:18.980 --> 23:19.980
was before.

23:20.340 --> 23:26.940
And also, there is a good best practice example now in the USA with, or let me check the name,

23:26.940 --> 23:35.860
I noted it down, the National, the Center for Medical, Medicaid and Medicare Services

23:35.860 --> 23:39.780
has been launching the first open source program office.

23:39.780 --> 23:40.780
Yeah.

23:40.780 --> 23:44.620
I was pretty amazed by reading this, I was like, oh my God, I never thought this would

23:44.620 --> 23:45.620
be happening.

23:46.260 --> 23:49.100
I was like, aren't they?

23:49.100 --> 23:50.100
I'm sure.

23:50.100 --> 23:57.060
So I had to double check, I was reading two or three different newspapers about it.

23:57.060 --> 24:01.900
I think the person who is involved with that has been long involved in the free software

24:01.900 --> 24:02.900
world.

24:02.900 --> 24:03.900
Yeah, that's what she said.

24:03.900 --> 24:04.900
Yeah, yeah.

24:04.900 --> 24:05.900
So that's really cool.

24:05.900 --> 24:10.700
I mean, it just shows that when we bring people in and get them up to speed, they go

24:10.700 --> 24:13.220
elsewhere and do really cool stuff.

24:13.220 --> 24:20.380
I mean, I want to be optimistic, but this desire to create OSPOs everywhere is very

24:20.380 --> 24:24.780
well-intentioned, but I have to say that a lot of times it doesn't actually result in

24:24.780 --> 24:25.780
more free software.

24:25.780 --> 24:33.060
It results in offices and conversations about that basically wind up having institutions

24:33.060 --> 24:36.100
use the stuff they were going to use anyway.

24:36.100 --> 24:39.700
But I'd like to see that, I mean, they're baby steps, right?

24:39.700 --> 24:44.300
There have been good collaboration that have come from some OSPOs and I don't know if every

24:44.300 --> 24:50.100
single thing needs to have an OSPO, but everything could because there's free software in everything

24:50.100 --> 24:55.740
somehow, somewhere, even if it's not copy left, so it doesn't really give you rights,

24:55.740 --> 25:01.380
even if it's fragmented and proprietorized, even if it's exploitative.

25:01.380 --> 25:02.380
Yeah.

25:02.380 --> 25:08.980
But we also have this movement in Europe that we see more OSPOs everywhere and also do have

25:08.980 --> 25:14.020
the feeling that it's not really contributing to more free software, but more chats about.

25:14.020 --> 25:20.740
No, but I also do believe in particular when we talk about administrations, for example,

25:20.740 --> 25:25.140
I'm not sure if this is the best approach to first set up an OSPO.

25:25.140 --> 25:30.460
I think it's more important to work on the mindset and if you have a proper mindset,

25:30.460 --> 25:33.660
you don't need the OSPO and the other way around.

25:33.660 --> 25:35.540
Completely agree.

25:35.620 --> 25:40.700
I sometimes, it's not often, but I sometimes have the feeling it also goes in the direction

25:40.700 --> 25:45.580
of having a thick leaf, basically, and you can then just say, look, I have OSPO, talk

25:45.580 --> 25:48.260
to these people and I don't have to care anymore.

25:48.260 --> 25:56.220
And so we also need to see where this development goes, but I'm also not the biggest fan of

25:56.220 --> 26:02.220
these OSPOs and I really don't see the actual need in every case where they set up an OSPO,

26:02.220 --> 26:03.220
to be honest.

26:03.220 --> 26:04.220
Yeah.

26:04.540 --> 26:05.540
All right.

26:05.540 --> 26:11.580
So you're quite looking forward into the future and how can people actually participate

26:11.580 --> 26:18.420
in this and how can people help bring this, help with the movement and help to make this.

26:18.420 --> 26:21.940
On the one hand, we have to safeguard what we have.

26:21.940 --> 26:22.940
That's for sure.

26:22.940 --> 26:31.300
But also, I mean, as Kevin also said, maybe it sounded a bit too nice, but what I just

26:31.380 --> 26:37.420
said, it's not everything is just super mind-blowing or something good in Europe when you talk

26:37.420 --> 26:38.420
about free software.

26:38.420 --> 26:42.980
So, I mean, we also, for example, still run our campaign, public money, public code,

26:42.980 --> 26:44.740
and this is still needed.

26:44.740 --> 26:50.340
So we are very far away from the point where every administration is using free software

26:50.340 --> 26:53.980
or that they are even only procuring for software.

26:53.980 --> 26:59.540
So just recently in Germany, the budget have been cut for free software and billions of

26:59.580 --> 27:02.340
euro have been spent to procure oracle, for example.

27:02.340 --> 27:04.980
So there's still a lot to do.

27:04.980 --> 27:09.500
And in this regard, for example, you can help us by signing this campaign.

27:09.500 --> 27:16.300
I think it's very important that we show that a lot of people like demand with us that

27:16.300 --> 27:19.860
every administration should procure free software.

27:19.860 --> 27:24.900
And all what you can also do is, and this works out quite well, is to go to your local

27:24.940 --> 27:27.100
administration and talk to them and convince them.

27:27.100 --> 27:30.260
And we have dedicated materials for this.

27:30.260 --> 27:34.780
We have a brochure made for decision makers for local administrations, which you can download

27:34.780 --> 27:36.020
or order on our website.

27:36.020 --> 27:38.500
And you can use it to convince your local administration.

27:38.500 --> 27:43.260
And we have seen, for example, volunteers who managed to convince a whole parliament

27:43.260 --> 27:48.220
to sign our campaign, the Parliament of Asturias in Spain, where Hackspace worked for like

27:48.220 --> 27:52.740
pretty much like one, one and a half year to convince the parliament to sign this campaign.

27:52.740 --> 27:54.500
And I think that's awesome work.

27:54.500 --> 28:00.860
And this also shows how you can, as a volunteer on a regional and local level, make a huge

28:00.860 --> 28:01.340
change.

28:01.340 --> 28:07.180
And that's something I think you can still do where you can learn from best practices.

28:07.180 --> 28:10.860
You can see that it works out and where you can make a change.

28:10.860 --> 28:16.820
And this, for example, definitely something where you can not only help us as FSFE, but

28:16.820 --> 28:18.740
basically the whole movement.

28:18.740 --> 28:21.620
And we also do have other campaigns.

28:21.660 --> 28:30.860
So if you are young, for example, I think that's some body, very, very old stars between

28:30.860 --> 28:36.820
14 and 18, for example, we are running a use hacking for freedom contest.

28:36.820 --> 28:42.100
And that's also something where we are looking for, for, yeah, basically, free software

28:42.100 --> 28:44.260
contributions from, from teenagers.

28:44.260 --> 28:47.580
And we have seen some pretty cool projects in the last two years.

28:47.980 --> 28:54.220
And that's also something where you can take part and contribute to the movement, basically.

28:54.740 --> 28:59.300
And I mean, we have other campaigns like on router freedom, basically device

28:59.300 --> 29:00.900
neutrality is a topic we cover.

29:01.300 --> 29:03.900
And there are so many activities you can join.

29:03.900 --> 29:11.340
And we have a dedicated part on our website where you can like click and join.

29:11.340 --> 29:16.780
And you can also help Bonnie, for example, with translations, which is also heavily

29:16.780 --> 29:20.500
needed, because I do believe that translation plays also an important role when we

29:20.500 --> 29:24.580
talk about Europe and like the distribution of news.

29:25.420 --> 29:26.660
Yeah, no, it's true.

29:26.660 --> 29:31.500
Like with translations, you always make information available to people who do not

29:31.500 --> 29:32.140
speak English.

29:33.140 --> 29:34.940
And so thank you, Alex.

29:36.020 --> 29:40.060
Karen, for you, from your side, what's funny, I was going to give a similar, like

29:40.180 --> 29:43.100
think globally act locally kind of answer.

29:43.980 --> 29:49.020
You know, like, it's, I always say, it's never a bad time to talk about software

29:49.020 --> 29:52.540
freedom, like talk about software freedom in the doctor's office.

29:53.940 --> 30:00.540
The grocery store, my relatives, and, you know, like, it's, it's, it's having a

30:00.540 --> 30:05.580
network of people that are like you people listening that talking to the folks that

30:05.580 --> 30:10.820
you know, not in a like preachy kind of like, like you've got to listen to the

30:10.820 --> 30:12.180
thing I'm talking about.

30:12.180 --> 30:15.980
And if you don't understand, you're a bad person, but more like, have you thought

30:15.980 --> 30:16.500
about this?

30:16.500 --> 30:17.260
And it's really cool.

30:17.260 --> 30:18.580
And this is what I care about.

30:18.580 --> 30:19.940
And have you thought about it?

30:19.940 --> 30:22.180
And like, you know, we really could do things differently.

30:22.180 --> 30:26.180
Like there are gentle conversations that you could consistently have that make a

30:26.180 --> 30:30.380
huge difference, even if you're not going to, you know, your local legislature,

30:30.380 --> 30:31.620
which I recommend that you do.

30:31.860 --> 30:33.580
But like that's a lot for some people.

30:33.580 --> 30:36.700
It's enough for you to just persistently talk about it.

30:36.940 --> 30:41.660
I am that annoying person at like parent teacher meetings who raises my hand and

30:41.660 --> 30:45.860
say, says, do we really need to be using Google accounts for that?

30:45.860 --> 30:47.500
Like Google services for this?

30:47.500 --> 30:52.300
Because, you know, like, you know, or, or Zoom is like a really problematic

30:52.300 --> 30:55.580
technology, just want to like take a second and like, maybe think about if we

30:55.580 --> 30:56.620
could do something better.

30:56.900 --> 31:00.420
And we're at the point where I was saying where people respond to that.

31:00.660 --> 31:04.980
So, you know, and then I think if you want to act really locally, you could take

31:04.980 --> 31:07.900
a look at the things that you buy.

31:08.540 --> 31:13.740
And if there's copy left at software in your devices with anything embedded,

31:14.020 --> 31:19.140
then you can, you can ask for that source code, check and see if there's an

31:19.140 --> 31:22.100
offer for source and ask the company for the source.

31:22.140 --> 31:26.580
Like the more people that do it, the more companies get the message that

31:26.700 --> 31:29.380
following the rules and providing the source code is important.

31:29.660 --> 31:33.620
And then, you know, like we're working on ways by the time this is released,

31:33.620 --> 31:37.860
we'll have launched a website called, called use the source where people can

31:37.860 --> 31:41.820
come and if you get a source candidate from requesting source code, you can put

31:41.820 --> 31:46.620
it up there and analyze it, see if it's like a compliance and then work together.

31:46.620 --> 31:50.060
If there's something you want to fix or if there's something that, you know, if

31:50.060 --> 31:54.420
there's, if there's some kind of way that we could use the source code to make

31:54.420 --> 31:59.260
our, our equipment better, like that's a, a place that we could start.

31:59.420 --> 32:00.740
So I'm really excited about that.

32:00.740 --> 32:02.900
And I think that's actually launching today at Fossam.

32:03.380 --> 32:04.020
Wow.

32:05.020 --> 32:06.260
That sounds pretty nice.

32:06.660 --> 32:11.980
Um, if something is happening, like if some, if they don't respond correctly,

32:12.020 --> 32:13.140
is there any help?

32:14.140 --> 32:14.780
Yeah, I mean, so

32:14.780 --> 32:17.020
If you could offer from the Freedom Conservancy.

32:17.100 --> 32:21.020
So what I'm really excited about this is that this is like a way for ordinary

32:21.020 --> 32:24.860
people to learn how to check whether source code is in compliance.

32:25.100 --> 32:28.580
And so it's a forum where people can teach each other and talk to each other.

32:28.900 --> 32:33.100
And, um, we at Software Freedom Conservancy, we hold all of these skills.

32:33.100 --> 32:34.700
There are a few people that are around.

32:34.700 --> 32:38.260
Some people work, help with the FSFE with us once in a while, but like really

32:38.260 --> 32:41.740
we've got the, like the, the shop of people, like all the people who used to

32:41.740 --> 32:44.740
work at the Free Software Foundation doing it and now working for us.

32:44.900 --> 32:50.540
And it's wrong for us to just have that knowledge in-house and, you know, not

32:50.540 --> 32:51.140
share it.

32:51.180 --> 32:55.700
And so this is like a real effort to bring GPL compliance checking into the

32:55.700 --> 32:58.500
public and anyone can learn it and you can all check it.

32:58.620 --> 33:01.100
Like, so, so that's the idea about it.

33:01.460 --> 33:04.420
As far as companies are concerned, like, will we help them?

33:04.620 --> 33:05.660
You know, it's really interesting.

33:05.660 --> 33:09.300
We decided that what we're going to do is we're going to give, we're going to

33:09.300 --> 33:12.700
let companies register with our website.

33:13.300 --> 33:18.060
And if they register with Use the Source, if somebody wants to post a source

33:18.060 --> 33:23.580
candidate for a company's products, then we will notify the company if they

33:23.580 --> 33:27.900
registered with us and they'll have seven days to, like, double check whether

33:27.900 --> 33:31.220
or not that's like a source candidate they want there.

33:31.540 --> 33:36.780
And so, like, to begin a dialogue and then folks could, you know, like, you

33:36.780 --> 33:40.780
know, there, these are source candidates that have been published so or been

33:40.780 --> 33:41.540
sent around.

33:41.540 --> 33:45.500
So the company should stand behind them, but it's a further way to engage

33:45.500 --> 33:47.820
those companies so that we could see more compliance in the long run.

33:47.820 --> 33:52.740
And our lawsuits in the United States are really focused on establishing a

33:52.780 --> 33:56.020
third party right to be able to get your source code.

33:56.300 --> 33:59.420
And so that's what we've been really focused on because while it's important

33:59.420 --> 34:02.940
that the folks that write the software that have the copyrights are able to

34:02.940 --> 34:08.140
license the code in a way that's shared, ultimately, if that doesn't result in

34:08.140 --> 34:12.460
downstream people getting the source code and, like, being able to modify it,

34:12.460 --> 34:14.500
then it doesn't really stand for very much.

34:14.540 --> 34:18.180
So I'm excited to see we recently had a decision.

34:18.900 --> 34:25.100
It's just a procedural decision, but the judge in our Visio case wrote very,

34:25.100 --> 34:30.100
very strongly saying that there are third party rights with respect to enforcement.

34:30.100 --> 34:33.380
So I'm really excited about that and we'll see it all kind of fits together.

34:33.380 --> 34:37.740
So ask, ask for your, ask for your source, everybody, exercise your offer.

34:39.820 --> 34:45.380
I take this as a good word for my last and final question.

34:46.020 --> 34:48.100
You all know I love Free Software Day on this day.

34:48.100 --> 34:50.820
We say thank you to all the contributors for free software.

34:51.540 --> 34:54.260
And I would like to hear from you.

34:54.260 --> 34:58.500
Is there a, is there a project or a contributor that you would like to say

34:58.500 --> 35:02.700
thank you to? If there is someone who pops into your mind.

35:02.700 --> 35:04.780
I know Alex Free Software Games.

35:04.780 --> 35:06.780
Alex loves Free Software Games.

35:06.780 --> 35:07.780
I have a new one.

35:07.780 --> 35:08.780
I have a new one.

35:08.780 --> 35:09.780
I'm sorry.

35:09.780 --> 35:11.780
OK, don't know what I hear.

35:12.180 --> 35:14.620
I was in the conference last year in Valencia

35:14.620 --> 35:18.260
and that was a community of coin collectors.

35:18.260 --> 35:23.180
And these coin collectors are using a free software tool that brings them together.

35:23.740 --> 35:26.340
And I learned a lot about collecting coins,

35:27.420 --> 35:29.380
but even more about this awesome tool.

35:29.380 --> 35:34.300
And that's, I think, something it's, it's a tool made by, I think, a few people.

35:35.300 --> 35:37.060
And it's called DelDao.

35:37.060 --> 35:41.900
And it's basically, yeah, out there to bring together these,

35:41.900 --> 35:46.100
these communities collecting coins, but also there's a university in New York

35:46.100 --> 35:53.140
and the professor is using the tool to collect some historic data about interviews she made.

35:53.140 --> 35:59.940
And so you can also see how the tool is like growing with the needs of the community.

35:59.940 --> 36:04.260
And it's, it was just like lovely to see how they interacted for two days

36:04.700 --> 36:10.420
in order to come together around a tool which was created by two people, basically.

36:10.420 --> 36:14.660
And that was just lovely to see and basically exactly this

36:14.660 --> 36:17.580
while of this free software community so much.

36:17.580 --> 36:21.220
So that was just an outstanding moment and a lovely conference.

36:21.220 --> 36:24.140
And that's why I want to mention them here in this podcast and want to thank them,

36:24.460 --> 36:27.060
even if I'm not using the tool.

36:27.060 --> 36:28.740
No coin collector.

36:28.740 --> 36:30.340
I'm not a coin collector.

36:30.340 --> 36:31.500
But it sounds really nice.

36:31.500 --> 36:35.460
I think this is the spirit of free software that we need this community spirit.

36:35.460 --> 36:39.700
And this we are here together and let's start this movement.

36:39.940 --> 36:40.580
Absolutely.

36:41.460 --> 36:42.500
Karen, you're thank you.

36:42.500 --> 36:44.580
I have two things that I'm going to say.

36:44.580 --> 36:46.260
I think I hope that's okay.

36:46.260 --> 36:47.860
The first one is you, Bonnie.

36:47.860 --> 36:48.740
Oh my God, no.

36:48.740 --> 36:50.340
Oh, I know, I know.

36:50.340 --> 36:54.500
It is because you bring so much enthusiasm to these conversations.

36:54.500 --> 36:58.100
And like, I have to say, like I've talked to you more over the last year

36:58.100 --> 37:03.620
and like every time I talk to you, I'm so impressed with how committed to software freedom you are

37:03.620 --> 37:09.540
and how you're able to drive the conversation in ways that make it a lot more impactful and effective.

37:09.620 --> 37:10.820
So thank you.

37:10.820 --> 37:12.180
I really appreciate you.

37:12.180 --> 37:12.820
Thank you.

37:12.820 --> 37:13.620
That's really nice.

37:13.620 --> 37:17.140
But lest I seem like I'm trying to butter up the host of this podcast.

37:18.660 --> 37:21.460
The second thing that popped into my head is a little premature

37:21.460 --> 37:23.940
because I haven't actually used it yet, but I'm really excited.

37:23.940 --> 37:25.140
I'm so excited to that.

37:25.700 --> 37:31.940
It's valetudo because I bought, I've always wanted a robot vacuum.

37:31.940 --> 37:35.140
And it's all part of our devices are really problematic.

37:35.140 --> 37:36.260
They're super problematic.

37:37.140 --> 37:40.180
Like they're, and valetudo doesn't solve all the problems,

37:40.180 --> 37:44.020
but it does at least allow you, it is free software and it allows you

37:44.020 --> 37:47.220
to not have your robot vacuum centralized.

37:47.220 --> 37:52.500
And you can limit, you can basically replace a good amount of the software with free software.

37:52.500 --> 37:56.740
And I'm super excited to be able to try out a robot vacuum in my house.

37:57.860 --> 37:59.780
I'm also super excited for this.

37:59.780 --> 38:00.820
I'll have to report back.

38:00.820 --> 38:05.460
And you know, I'm also going to have to like figure out if the robot vacuum,

38:05.460 --> 38:09.140
when I get it, I have to figure out, like, you know, if there's an offer for source,

38:09.140 --> 38:13.300
like how badly the vacuum is in violation and like, you know,

38:13.300 --> 38:17.940
whether or not we really should be having access to the, you know, like, but,

38:17.940 --> 38:21.460
but nonetheless, I think this is, this is a really cool project.

38:21.460 --> 38:22.980
And I'm very excited to try.

38:29.140 --> 38:30.180
All right.

38:30.180 --> 38:32.100
Thank you too for being here.

38:32.100 --> 38:35.380
Thank you for talking about free software with me and the current status.

38:35.380 --> 38:41.060
I know it's a broad topic, but I still have the feeling that we're getting closer

38:41.620 --> 38:44.420
to software freedom, even if it's in us 300 years.

38:44.420 --> 38:46.100
I don't believe that, to be honest.

38:46.100 --> 38:47.220
I don't believe that at all.

38:47.220 --> 38:48.180
I don't either.

38:48.180 --> 38:50.180
I'm more positive about this.

38:50.180 --> 38:52.260
I would say there's so much happening.

38:52.260 --> 38:53.460
There's so much going on.

38:53.460 --> 38:59.220
And especially with, I have to feeling like over the past year, you talk to so many MPs

38:59.860 --> 39:03.940
and it's like crazy how many of them are listening and how many of them

39:03.940 --> 39:10.180
actually understood free software, even if they are not like changing it in this moment.

39:10.180 --> 39:13.380
It is a groundwork and it's happening.

39:13.380 --> 39:19.540
And also every time I research free software in the US, it's like,

39:19.540 --> 39:24.020
I do have the feeling that it's also, yeah, I really have the feeling that

39:24.020 --> 39:25.140
there is a lot of optimism.

39:25.380 --> 39:31.780
The FCC reached out to us to ask us to participate in a panel to get information from us.

39:31.780 --> 39:32.580
And that was public.

39:32.580 --> 39:36.900
And then the FCC submitted that panel to the copyright office without even,

39:37.460 --> 39:40.180
like as part of their own process.

39:40.180 --> 39:41.060
And that was very exciting.

39:41.060 --> 39:43.300
We submitted our own comments to the copyright office.

39:43.300 --> 39:45.300
We submitted our own comments to NIST.

39:45.300 --> 39:48.100
So we're trying to be active in all of those forums,

39:48.100 --> 39:53.300
but to see the interest coming from the agencies before we even were reaching out to them is great.

39:55.140 --> 39:59.140
Optimism, it's happening and we can all participate.

39:59.940 --> 40:01.860
So this is the most important thing.

40:01.860 --> 40:03.860
So thank you too for being here.

40:03.860 --> 40:06.420
And with this, I will release you to your death room.

40:10.020 --> 40:13.140
This will happen quite soon as far as I hear.

40:15.700 --> 40:17.540
This was the Software Freedom podcast.

40:17.540 --> 40:20.900
This podcast is brought to you by the Free Software Foundation Europe.

40:20.900 --> 40:24.500
We are a charity that empowers users to control technology.

40:24.500 --> 40:28.500
If you like this podcast, please recommend it to your friends and rate it.

40:28.500 --> 40:33.860
You can also support us with that donation under fse.org slash donate.

40:34.820 --> 40:45.860
Bye bye.

Back to the episode SFP#24