Say no to locked-down devices that limit our freedom to install apps and switch operating systems. Say yes to device neutrality, which ensures that we control our own hardware! Your device, your choice! Support our demand for the right to install any software on our devices.

Transcript of SFP#31: Policy and EU: FOSDEM recap

Back to the episode SFP#31

This is a transcript created with the Free Software tool Whisper. For more information and feedback reach out to podcast@fsfe.org


   

SFP#031: Policy and EU: FOSDEM recap

1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000 Before we start after the podcast, we would like to say thank you to all of you who support the FSF East Work of Money. 2 00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:12,000 Working for software freedom and producing podcasts costs money. 3 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:20,000 Please consider supporting us with the nation on the FSFE.org slash donate and in the show notes. 4 00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:26,000 Bringing these people together also takes time. 5 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:29,000 It needs energy, finding, coming, crown. 6 00:00:29,000 --> 00:00:31,000 See where we can work together. 7 00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:33,000 This needs a lot of time. 8 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:38,000 Resources and yeah, if you donate to us, you make this work possible. 9 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:40,000 You make our fights for funding possible. 10 00:00:40,000 --> 00:00:44,000 And then also one day we benefit you. 11 00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:51,000 If you, for example, develop and maybe we get funds for your project in the future. 12 00:00:51,000 --> 00:01:09,000 Hello and welcome to the software freedom podcast. 13 00:01:09,000 --> 00:01:13,000 This podcast is presented to you by the Free Software Foundation Europe. 14 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:17,000 We are a charity that empowered users to take control of technology. 15 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:21,000 I'm body married and today I'm here with Alexander Sander. 16 00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:25,000 Alex is the senior policy consultant for the FSFE. 17 00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:30,000 And in his work for the FSFE, he monitors the current happenings in the European Union 18 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:34,000 and also pushes for the recognition of the software. 19 00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:39,000 Yeah, today in this policy and EU episode, I don't know. 20 00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:42,000 I find this is a tongue breaker, trying to understand. 21 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:43,000 They are called tanked. 22 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:45,000 So you know what I mean? 23 00:01:45,000 --> 00:01:49,000 Alex and I will talk about our host and experience. 24 00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:54,000 And especially the outcome of the two DevRooms that were on the FSFE. 25 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:56,000 Alex, thank you so much for making the time. 26 00:01:56,000 --> 00:02:01,000 Thank you so much for being here on our second try for the recording. 27 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:04,000 Yeah, thanks for having me. 28 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:09,000 Okay, so how was the two DevRooms? 29 00:02:09,000 --> 00:02:11,000 I remember they were not only run by the FSFE. 30 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,000 There were others involved as well. 31 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:17,000 So in the EU and policy DevRooms, who was involved again? 32 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:26,000 So we partnering on two DevRooms, the legal and policy DevRooms that we are 33 00:02:27,000 --> 00:02:31,000 organizing together with other organizations like the Software Freedom Conservancy, 34 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:38,000 Red Hat, Tom Marble, something we started to work on together doing the corona crisis, 35 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:41,000 the DevRooms itself is longer than a decade. 36 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:48,000 And it's very well established, DevRooms where we talk about SNS, legal and policy, 37 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:50,000 related issues. 38 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:56,000 And this year, we obviously again talked a lot about the cyber resilience act, 39 00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:03,000 a topic that keeps the first them or one could say the broader Free Software community, 40 00:03:03,000 --> 00:03:08,000 discussing for pretty much two years, I think we started to discuss during the first 41 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:10,000 them, the cyber resilience act. 42 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:16,000 And since we are now facing the implementation, some very practical questions arise. 43 00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:20,000 Which is important for us in particular for the FSFE. 44 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:24,000 There is a so-called Stewart role introduced in the cyber resilience act, 45 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:30,000 so there are manufacturers, Stewart and the basically one could say individual developers, 46 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,000 these three roles are somehow given. 47 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:39,000 And there are exemptions in particular for people that don't earn money with free software 48 00:03:39,000 --> 00:03:44,000 or smaller projects, projects that are non-profit projects, 49 00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:49,000 and here we discuss which role they might have in the cyber resilience act 50 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:52,000 and what application might arise for them. 51 00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:59,000 And how we can, in particular, support stewards in the relationship as manufacturers, 52 00:03:59,000 --> 00:04:05,000 so that in particular, non-profit work is not destroyed by the cyber resilience act, 53 00:04:05,000 --> 00:04:08,000 but in more important, maybe even supported. 54 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:16,000 And that was a huge discussion we had together with Michael from the German BSI, 55 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:20,000 so the Bundesant for Sicherheit in the information station, 56 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:24,000 so basically the IT security agency for Germany, 57 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:29,000 which also most likely be the market surveillance authority. 58 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:34,000 For the cyber resilience act was there with me together on a session where we hosted, 59 00:04:34,000 --> 00:04:38,000 yeah, basically a Q&A session on this Stewart question, 60 00:04:38,000 --> 00:04:44,000 and I think that was very useful and intense discussion we had, 61 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:48,000 so we tried to address these issues, 62 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:52,000 but also listen to the community what they see, what their fears are, 63 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:59,000 and this ultimately will also end in a project that we run together with this German BSI, 64 00:04:59,000 --> 00:05:01,000 this IT security agency, 65 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:06,000 where we precisely want to research on this question, 66 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,000 how the relationship between stewards and manufacturers will be, 67 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:15,000 so this first session could be also seen as a starting point to this research, 68 00:05:15,000 --> 00:05:19,000 and I would also like to use this postcard episode to, 69 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:23,000 to kind of as a call, so basically if you are a Stewart, 70 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:26,000 or if you believe you might be a Stewart, 71 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:31,000 a few, three to reach out to me directly or to contact at FFE.org, 72 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:37,000 and we are working on a questionary which we want to share with manufacturers, 73 00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:40,000 stewards and interested stakeholders, 74 00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:44,000 and in order to come up with this question there where we want to address those questions, 75 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:47,000 we are looking for input, so if you should have some, 76 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:52,000 it's recommended to you to watch the Q&A session on this year, 77 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:54,000 from the first term, 78 00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:58,000 and maybe reach out to us if you have some input in this direction for us. 79 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:01,000 How was the Q&A session, like how many people were there, 80 00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:06,000 and how, what was your feeling from the questions that, 81 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:09,000 where are those, that are those Q&A session? 82 00:06:09,000 --> 00:06:11,000 Because we are just a cyber-resilience act, 83 00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:15,000 I believe this is the act that we discussed the most in the previous, 84 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:16,000 in the past year. 85 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:19,000 Yeah, it's definitely a huge discussion on going, 86 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:23,000 and that's basically good, but bad at the same time. 87 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:27,000 It's good since a lot of people take care of this very important topic. 88 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:34,000 The bad part is that there are some rumors and myths around the cyber-resilience act. 89 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:39,000 One of our tasks is to explain what's really in, what's not in. 90 00:06:39,000 --> 00:06:42,000 However, there are still, as I said, many open questions 91 00:06:42,000 --> 00:06:44,000 when it comes to implementation, 92 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:48,000 basically the needy-credi of transforming the sentences we have in the law, 93 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:50,000 into something which is working, 94 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:54,000 and I think it is important for the community to know 95 00:06:54,000 --> 00:06:56,000 that there will be basically, in the end, 96 00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:59,000 a market surveillance authority who is doing this, 97 00:06:59,000 --> 00:07:02,000 and it's a good idea to talk to precisely this body, 98 00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:06,000 and since they really can't have this rules on how they do it, 99 00:07:06,000 --> 00:07:09,000 how they see all of this, how they implemented, 100 00:07:09,000 --> 00:07:13,000 so I think it's important to learn that, 101 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:16,000 basically, it's the market surveillance authority who says, 102 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:20,000 this is a steward, and this steward now needs to fulfill these obligations. 103 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:23,000 So that's why it's a good idea to talk to them, 104 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:25,000 to listen what they have in mind, 105 00:07:25,000 --> 00:07:29,000 and maybe to advocate if it's going in a wrong direction. 106 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:32,000 So that was basically, I think, a very important point 107 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:34,000 we made during this discussion, 108 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:36,000 and which helped the people, however, 109 00:07:36,000 --> 00:07:38,000 so when it comes to the room, 110 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:42,000 we had one of these basically bigger lecture rooms. 111 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:46,000 It's very hard to guess how many people have been there, 112 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:49,000 so the room was pretty full, 113 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,000 and there was a huge interest in this topic, 114 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,000 so I'd say a few hundred, maybe, 115 00:07:54,000 --> 00:07:58,000 but don't talk me on that, 116 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:01,000 so I'm pretty poor in counting people. 117 00:08:01,000 --> 00:08:03,000 However, there was a huge interest, 118 00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:06,000 and I think, from the questions that came, 119 00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,000 it's also clear that there is still a lot of uncertainty 120 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,000 when it comes to M-I-N-S-Dewart, 121 00:08:13,000 --> 00:08:16,000 and if I am a steward, what do I have to do? 122 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:20,000 And I have to feeling that some people in our community 123 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:22,000 are feeling the rules, 124 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:25,000 and that they think that, for example, 125 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,000 issue could be that some sort of 126 00:08:29,000 --> 00:08:33,000 continuity agencies that don't have too much to do with open source, 127 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:36,000 want to be one of those stewards to earn money worth this, 128 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:37,000 and how to prevent this, 129 00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:41,000 and I think there's also a lot of fear on the obligations 130 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,000 that stewards might have that there's too much bureaucracy in this, 131 00:08:44,000 --> 00:08:46,000 and that they simply can't do it. 132 00:08:46,000 --> 00:08:49,000 And these are precisely the points we also want to 133 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,000 bring to the market surveillance authority, 134 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:53,000 and for this I think it was also good. 135 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,000 That they have been there, and that they have seen, 136 00:08:56,000 --> 00:09:00,000 like physically seeing how people are worried about this, 137 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:05,000 and that there is definitely needed to stay 138 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:07,000 and touch with these people to communicate with these people 139 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,000 to include them in the debate, 140 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:12,000 and to remove a bit of the fog, 141 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:15,000 which might be around this CIA, 142 00:09:15,000 --> 00:09:19,000 because ultimately I think it has more chances than downsides, 143 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:22,000 if you play it right during this implementation. 144 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:27,000 And that's something I have to feeling that people understood, 145 00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:29,000 so nothing is lost so far. 146 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,000 It's still in the making, 147 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:35,000 and we are actively searching for people contributing to this, 148 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:38,000 and if our community understood, 149 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:42,000 and this is I think what this panel definitely had for, 150 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:44,000 is that there is still room for improvements, 151 00:09:44,000 --> 00:09:46,000 then this is something which is, 152 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:49,000 the solar effects, that's what I think. 153 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:53,000 So as you said, that the people from their commissioner 154 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:56,000 are who, because there will be 155 00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:00,000 some agency that will define this to us, 156 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:04,000 so people from this planned agency, 157 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:10,000 or who was there and saw that some people are very worried about 158 00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:12,000 this whole server itself. 159 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:16,000 So basically it's the person who is working in the BSI, 160 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:20,000 the sort of department, which might be in charge 161 00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:23,000 of the Cyber Resilience Act in the implementation. 162 00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:26,000 The thing is that the CIA itself, 163 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:30,000 was just really released by the end of last year, 164 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:32,000 so member states are still discussing 165 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:35,000 who ultimately will be market surveillance authority, 166 00:10:35,000 --> 00:10:38,000 so it's not set in stone, 167 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:41,000 but it's likely that the BSI will be, 168 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:43,000 and ultimately the person who was there, 169 00:10:43,000 --> 00:10:45,000 and Michael is also the person, 170 00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:48,000 this whom I'm running the project together with CBI, 171 00:10:48,000 --> 00:10:51,000 in order to figure out how this relationship looked like. 172 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:54,000 So basically, one could say the representatives 173 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:57,000 of the department that will be in charge was there, 174 00:10:57,000 --> 00:11:00,000 and for this, it's a thing, 175 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:05,000 that's also sort of a very strong commitment 176 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:08,000 that market surveillance authorities do not only want 177 00:11:08,000 --> 00:11:10,000 to work with manufacturers, 178 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:12,000 or that they have only in eye for the industry, 179 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:16,000 but they also go actively to our community 180 00:11:16,000 --> 00:11:19,000 in order to learn about our demands or fears, 181 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,000 and I think that's something very valuable 182 00:11:22,000 --> 00:11:27,000 that Michael showed up and not only listen, 183 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:29,000 but also actively to part in this Q&A session 184 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:31,000 and try to address those questions 185 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:35,000 and trying to take away some of the fears 186 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:37,000 that are in the room. 187 00:11:37,000 --> 00:11:39,000 That I can imagine. 188 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,000 But so this was a successful era 189 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:47,000 and session in the EU and quality of what else happened there. 190 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:50,000 I think that it must have been not the only session there, 191 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:52,000 right? There were loads more. 192 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:56,000 And here do you were hanging around there the whole day? 193 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:58,000 Yeah, absolutely. 194 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:02,000 So it's always a intense experience. 195 00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:07,000 I mean, we start at 10, 30 and at 7, 196 00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:10,000 so that's quite a while. 197 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:13,000 And also I have to say that many people 198 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:15,000 stayed for the whole day in the room. 199 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:18,000 So obviously we had an interesting agenda 200 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:21,000 and often we also had to close the doors 201 00:12:21,000 --> 00:12:25,000 since the room was so packed that we can't let everybody in. 202 00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:28,000 So for all of you that couldn't see the talk, 203 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:30,000 they wanted to see there are also recordings 204 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:32,000 on the first and back side itself, 205 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:34,000 where you can watch all the talks 206 00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:36,000 and also on FFE.org. 207 00:12:36,000 --> 00:12:38,000 You find the news item in the blog post 208 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:41,000 where we also report about what happened. 209 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,000 I want to highlight in this podcast again, 210 00:12:44,000 --> 00:12:46,000 a very practical talk we had, 211 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:50,000 which is on the mandatory B2B e-in voices 212 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,000 and which this means for software. 213 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:55,000 I think that was a very interesting talk 214 00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:59,000 since it addresses a very practical hands-on question 215 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,000 that is basically coming to us, 216 00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:05,000 which in the first place doesn't look like a free software problem, 217 00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:10,000 but there are some strings attached to the free software community. 218 00:13:10,000 --> 00:13:12,000 So that was a pretty hands-on talk, 219 00:13:12,000 --> 00:13:17,000 I think this is also always nice to have. 220 00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:23,000 Also we discussed in this like hands-on tool related topic, 221 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:28,000 a tool from the UBIN data protection board, 222 00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:30,000 which is basically a compliance tool 223 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:35,000 where you can check how your website is in line with data protection laws 224 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,000 and this is also an open source tool. 225 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:42,000 So here we can see how UBIN institutions 226 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:45,000 also are made use of open source tools 227 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:49,000 in order to fulfill the obligations in order to help. 228 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:52,000 Companies out there are in this case like, 229 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:55,000 yeah, people who run a website. 230 00:13:55,000 --> 00:13:57,000 Also I mean, which is very important for us, 231 00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:02,000 in particular for the FSE is the discussion we have on the DNA 232 00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:04,000 and the Apple litigation case. 233 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:09,000 So my colleague Lucas is working on basically 234 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:15,000 interoperability question when it comes to the App Store on iOS, 235 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:20,000 so Apple phones and tablets. 236 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:26,000 And here we run a legal activity against Apple 237 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:30,000 and that was in particular interesting 238 00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:33,000 since there was a fire side chat with somebody 239 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:36,000 or with two people from the UBIN commission 240 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,000 that were giving insights in their daily work, 241 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:42,000 how they do this and yeah, 242 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:46,000 what questions arise when we talk about the gatekeeper issue, 243 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:51,000 device neutrality topics and how we legally try to enforce this 244 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:55,000 together with the commission to make sure that on the Apple, 245 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:58,000 as device is this in the future possible 246 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:03,000 to, for example, also install the F-Troid app store 247 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:07,000 and by that you will be able to also get apps. 248 00:15:07,000 --> 00:15:10,000 There are not coming from this Apple universe 249 00:15:10,000 --> 00:15:13,000 but can be free software from the F-Troid store, for example. 250 00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:15,000 So a very interesting legal case. 251 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:20,000 I think it will be somehow also covered in this podcast episode 252 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:24,000 since there will be some results one day 253 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:29,000 and we hope to be able to safeguard device neutrality business. 254 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:31,000 And yeah, that was also in particular, 255 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:34,000 since people from the UBIN commission showed up again 256 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:37,000 I think a sign that's European institutions 257 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:41,000 that institutions in general do take care of what we do 258 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:46,000 that they follow our arguments even more 259 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:53,000 and that they also even more up to also join these kind of like community events 260 00:15:53,000 --> 00:15:56,000 like the first them and explain their work towards this community 261 00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:59,000 and I think that's also a very strong statement 262 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:02,000 from the commission to join these fireside chat. 263 00:16:02,000 --> 00:16:05,000 Where you know it's the first them, 264 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:08,000 people are very critical to people 265 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:11,000 and they sometimes ask questions that are not so nice 266 00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:14,000 for institution people or decision makers, 267 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:16,000 but they show up, they took the questions 268 00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:19,000 and that's I think something we should also value 269 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:23,000 that more and more people from the institutions 270 00:16:23,000 --> 00:16:26,000 are coming on a week and to explain their work 271 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:30,000 and that's also a good result of our work at check. 272 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:33,000 Yeah, it makes them more approachable, right? 273 00:16:33,000 --> 00:16:35,000 I just thought that this was like, 274 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:40,000 it's actually a chance to engage with policy makers 275 00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:44,000 and to talk about your fears and your thoughts 276 00:16:44,000 --> 00:16:47,000 and bring them to their attention. 277 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,000 Absolutely, and I do believe a dialogue is always better 278 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:54,000 to have with the people we want to basically address 279 00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:56,000 with our demands, so it's better to talk with them 280 00:16:56,000 --> 00:17:00,000 instead of over them and for this I think it's also underlying 281 00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:04,000 how important this event is and that they see 282 00:17:04,000 --> 00:17:06,000 that it is an important event for them 283 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:09,000 to go there and to meet these kind of stakeholders 284 00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:12,000 so that they are not only meeting the industry 285 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,000 in the hidden hotel during the week, 286 00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:17,000 but that they also actively go on a Saturday 287 00:17:17,000 --> 00:17:20,000 to the university to an event 288 00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:22,000 which is absolutely crazy 289 00:17:22,000 --> 00:17:24,000 and if you have there for the very first time 290 00:17:24,000 --> 00:17:26,000 in particular, if you are living in the process but 291 00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,000 it's the complete opposite of what you normally see 292 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:31,000 how people advocate for something 293 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:34,000 and that they do the step that something 294 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:35,000 really valued a lot. 295 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:38,000 Okay, I can't imagine, I think that's a very nice of them 296 00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:41,000 and it shows a lot of commitment to the community. 297 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:45,000 This is a short break for our own cause. 298 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:49,000 Thank you for listening to this afternoon podcast. 299 00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:52,000 Working for software freedom and producing podcasts, 300 00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:53,000 cost money. 301 00:17:53,000 --> 00:17:56,000 Please consider supporting us with a donation 302 00:17:56,000 --> 00:18:01,000 on the ffs.org slash donate at the show notes. 303 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:10,000 So this was the legal and policy too. 304 00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:12,000 That room. 305 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:14,000 But I remember we had two. 306 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:15,000 Yes. 307 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:17,000 We did have another one. 308 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:19,000 It was one on Sunday. 309 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:20,000 Yeah. 310 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:22,000 It was the post funding. 311 00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,000 Yeah, since this other day it's not enough of work. 312 00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:30,000 I also decided to have no with some other organizations 313 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:33,000 to come up with a funding there from here. 314 00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:36,000 For example, we worked with the sovereignty agency from Germany. 315 00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:39,000 We worked with the Linux foundation, the prototype fund. 316 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:44,000 So people that are also already active in this sphere of funding. 317 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:47,000 We came together, I'd say, 318 00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:53,000 mid last year and decided on the idea to propose a funding 319 00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:54,000 that room. 320 00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:59,000 We precisely discussed basically all questions that arise 321 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:00,000 from funding. 322 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:04,000 So for example, from whom do you want to take funding? 323 00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:06,000 From whom not? 324 00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:10,000 Is there a way how we can identify, for example, 325 00:19:10,000 --> 00:19:14,000 very important projects or core infrastructure that we want to support? 326 00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:17,000 How much money do we want to give them? 327 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:24,000 Is there some sort of communication or some sort of activity 328 00:19:24,000 --> 00:19:28,000 to be more successful in fundraising, for example? 329 00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:32,000 So there are many discussions on funds on funding on where 330 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:37,000 money should come from, and all of these discussions 331 00:19:37,000 --> 00:19:41,000 happening here and there, but not like on one place. 332 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:45,000 And that's why we decided to come up with this dedicated funding 333 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:49,000 that room and I think that was also a huge success. 334 00:19:49,000 --> 00:19:53,000 So also this room was pretty packed during the whole day. 335 00:19:53,000 --> 00:19:57,000 And we had many, many submissions also in the first place. 336 00:19:57,000 --> 00:20:01,000 So we had to be very picky on the talks we had. 337 00:20:01,000 --> 00:20:05,000 And ultimately, but I think we came up with a very, very nice agenda 338 00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:09,000 that addressed most of the topics that somehow arise 339 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:11,000 when we talk about funding. 340 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:15,000 And also the discussions after every talk show that there is really 341 00:20:15,000 --> 00:20:19,000 in need for this discussion that there is a lot of expertise. 342 00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:23,000 Also, that was very nice to see that many participants who 343 00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:30,000 maybe had been rejected by their talk due to the nature of this very short date, 344 00:20:30,000 --> 00:20:35,000 which we had basically just eight hours, where we discussed this topic. 345 00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:38,000 But still in the room and sharing the expertise. 346 00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:43,000 And that was pretty nice to see that it was not just like people talking 347 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:47,000 and sharing the experience from the stage, but that there was also a lot 348 00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:51,000 of interaction with the people in the room that also not only ask questions, 349 00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:55,000 but also added a lot of very useful information. 350 00:20:55,000 --> 00:20:59,000 And for example, sources, so where you can look for money, 351 00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:02,000 how to do this, they shared the experience. 352 00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:06,000 And I think that was basically what the deaf room should look like, right? 353 00:21:06,000 --> 00:21:11,000 So that there is a discussion ongoing that there is, 354 00:21:11,000 --> 00:21:14,000 one could say, something starts there. 355 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:18,000 So I had a feeling that after this deaf room, 356 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:24,000 more and more people are now connected and can work together and collaborate on these questions. 357 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:27,000 So I would be very happy to see this deaf room again next year, 358 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:31,000 and maybe to see if there was already some sort of progress. 359 00:21:31,000 --> 00:21:34,000 Or if there are some new questions, I mean, 360 00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:38,000 we both also talked about the funding topic that we discussed. 361 00:21:38,000 --> 00:21:41,000 I think two at this also go, go. 362 00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:45,000 So there are also discussions ongoing, not only in the European Union, 363 00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:47,000 but also in member states and globally, 364 00:21:47,000 --> 00:21:49,000 how to invest in core infrastructure, 365 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:52,000 how to invest in digital to sovereignty, 366 00:21:52,000 --> 00:21:55,000 but world plays free software and all of this. 367 00:21:55,000 --> 00:22:07,000 And I think it's a good idea that our community is networking and collaborating on those questions in order to be able to influence these discussions happening on the European level. 368 00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:10,000 Like this input from us, 369 00:22:10,000 --> 00:22:17,000 because I do believe that our community is basically that one that can help in this debate a lot, 370 00:22:17,000 --> 00:22:20,000 in order to identify who are the people that need money, 371 00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:23,000 which are the projects that need support, 372 00:22:23,000 --> 00:22:26,000 and which are the other projects where we could also say, 373 00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:28,000 this is something that the market should invest, 374 00:22:28,000 --> 00:22:32,000 and not us taxpayers money. 375 00:22:32,000 --> 00:22:37,000 I think there are different sources we need to discuss, 376 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:41,000 we are managed to come from and it should always be private and public. 377 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:45,000 So in this, these are some questions that are not that easy 378 00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:48,000 to discuss when it comes again to the needy query, 379 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:54,000 and here I think it's a good idea if we can up this idea as out of our community ourselves, 380 00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:58,000 and point to the right project that needs support, 381 00:22:58,000 --> 00:23:01,000 and discuss this also within our community, 382 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:06,000 how we do believe funding for the free software ecosystem should look like, 383 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:09,000 and what's good for us is community and what not. 384 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:12,000 And therefore this deaf room was super helpful. 385 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:16,000 It was also pretty hands on if you are a project and you struggle with finding money. 386 00:23:16,000 --> 00:23:19,000 There are definitely talks, you should watch again, 387 00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:24,000 also here these talks are all recorded. 388 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:27,000 So you can go on the first step side, 389 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:29,000 channel to the deaf room, click the talk, 390 00:23:29,000 --> 00:23:31,000 and you will find the recording of the talk. 391 00:23:31,000 --> 00:23:33,000 So you can watch all of this again, 392 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:36,000 or I said, saying here we will also have a blog post, 393 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:38,000 and use the item on fissivee.org. 394 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,000 Where we report about this deaf room, 395 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:44,000 and where you can also find recordings and rewatch, 396 00:23:44,000 --> 00:23:46,000 what's interesting for you. 397 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:48,000 And I will also link them in the show notes. 398 00:23:48,000 --> 00:23:49,000 Yes. 399 00:23:49,000 --> 00:23:50,000 Perfect. 400 00:23:50,000 --> 00:23:52,000 Not all of the videos separately, 401 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:55,000 but the deaf room that you can go through the talk. 402 00:23:55,000 --> 00:23:56,000 Exactly. 403 00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:58,000 And then what's the recording? 404 00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:00,000 Because otherwise it would be a bit too much. 405 00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:03,000 Maybe I can attach also here, 406 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:05,000 a call to our community, 407 00:24:05,000 --> 00:24:07,000 or to our listeners of this podcast episode. 408 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:09,000 So if you are working on the topic of funding, 409 00:24:09,000 --> 00:24:11,000 or if you are interested in the topic of funding, 410 00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:14,000 if you want to contribute with this debate, 411 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:17,000 you're also free to reach out to me directly, 412 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:19,000 or to contact at fissivee.org. 413 00:24:19,000 --> 00:24:21,000 So we are still in the very early phase, 414 00:24:21,000 --> 00:24:23,000 I'd say, of this debate, 415 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:25,000 and it will keep us busy, 416 00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:27,000 I do believe for the next term. 417 00:24:27,000 --> 00:24:29,000 So basically for the next five years, 418 00:24:29,000 --> 00:24:30,000 you should debate, 419 00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:32,000 we are discussing, 420 00:24:32,000 --> 00:24:34,000 you will stick a one-stack, 421 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:36,000 we are discussing core infrastructure, 422 00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:38,000 we are discussing innovation in Europe, 423 00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:43,000 the new digital program will be coming up into years 424 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:46,000 where there might be potential sources for funding. 425 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:48,000 So the discussion is just about to start, 426 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:51,000 so if you want to take part in this discussion, 427 00:24:51,000 --> 00:24:52,000 if you have ideas, 428 00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:53,000 if you have points, 429 00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:55,000 or if you also have experience, 430 00:24:55,000 --> 00:24:58,000 which is a big interest for us, 431 00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:00,000 and if you are free to reach out to us. 432 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:03,000 That one's a good idea to get all of us, 433 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:04,000 if you could together, 434 00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:06,000 and to start with this discussion, 435 00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:07,000 also outside of Boston. 436 00:25:07,000 --> 00:25:10,000 But what was the best thing that happened in this, 437 00:25:10,000 --> 00:25:11,000 of course, 438 00:25:11,000 --> 00:25:12,000 funding, 439 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:13,000 deaf room for you, 440 00:25:13,000 --> 00:25:15,000 like what really stood out for you? 441 00:25:15,000 --> 00:25:19,000 What was the something I better to ask us to hire to name? 442 00:25:19,000 --> 00:25:23,000 So I don't want to pick a specific talk, 443 00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:26,000 but what I really liked was, 444 00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:27,000 what I already said, 445 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:29,000 that there was a lot of interaction in the deaf room. 446 00:25:29,000 --> 00:25:34,000 So, and that there was basically participants, 447 00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:36,000 and speakers have been on eye level, 448 00:25:36,000 --> 00:25:40,000 and it had been a very good exchange. 449 00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:45,000 I do believe that also speakers took some sort of information 450 00:25:45,000 --> 00:25:49,000 that was new to them away from this deaf room, 451 00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:52,000 and that's something which is really good. 452 00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:55,000 And I do believe also that this deaf room helped a lot, 453 00:25:55,000 --> 00:25:57,000 and in order to bring people together, 454 00:25:57,000 --> 00:26:00,000 to see who else is working on this topic, 455 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,000 and to be able to network with those people, 456 00:26:03,000 --> 00:26:06,000 and to be able to collaborate in the future, 457 00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:07,000 and that's, 458 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:08,000 I think, 459 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:10,000 the biggest result of this deaf room, 460 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:11,000 and yeah, 461 00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:13,000 bringing people together, 462 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:15,000 and pointing to it, 463 00:26:15,000 --> 00:26:17,000 and giving it the importance with, 464 00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:19,000 like also a dedicated deaf room, 465 00:26:19,000 --> 00:26:22,000 showed that there is the need to discuss this, 466 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:24,000 that there is a need from the community, 467 00:26:24,000 --> 00:26:26,000 and people are already working on this, 468 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:27,000 but that they are not, 469 00:26:27,000 --> 00:26:29,000 well, network together, 470 00:26:29,000 --> 00:26:31,000 but this room definitely had to, 471 00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:32,000 to create this, 472 00:26:32,000 --> 00:26:34,000 get people closer together, 473 00:26:34,000 --> 00:26:35,000 absolutely. 474 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:36,000 And that was, 475 00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:39,000 that was basically the best outcome for me, 476 00:26:39,000 --> 00:26:40,000 however, 477 00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:41,000 as said, 478 00:26:41,000 --> 00:26:43,000 so there is definitely something, 479 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:45,000 which is super interesting, 480 00:26:45,000 --> 00:26:46,000 so for me, 481 00:26:46,000 --> 00:26:48,000 in particular, 482 00:26:48,000 --> 00:26:51,000 the question on combining public and private efforts, 483 00:26:51,000 --> 00:26:54,000 so how we can bring together the market, 484 00:26:54,000 --> 00:26:57,000 and the taxpayers in order to support, 485 00:26:57,000 --> 00:26:59,000 free software ecosystem, 486 00:26:59,000 --> 00:27:02,000 that's one of the most interesting questions for me, 487 00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:03,000 because I do believe, 488 00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:05,000 it should not only be taxpayers money, 489 00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:06,000 but also private money, 490 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:07,000 and there, 491 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:08,000 it's definitely a question, 492 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:10,000 how can we push the market, 493 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:11,000 how can we, 494 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:13,000 in particular, push those who benefit from, 495 00:27:13,000 --> 00:27:14,000 feel software, 496 00:27:14,000 --> 00:27:16,000 but don't contribute back, 497 00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:17,000 how can we push them, 498 00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:19,000 and the very interesting part here is, 499 00:27:19,000 --> 00:27:21,000 that we can even combine this, 500 00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:22,000 we can combine this debate, 501 00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:24,000 with the cyber resilience act, 502 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:28,000 as we dare have these roles of the Stuart and manufacturer, 503 00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:31,000 and we want the manufacturer supporting the Stuart, 504 00:27:31,000 --> 00:27:32,000 so you can see that we, 505 00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:34,000 with this topic, 506 00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:35,000 also, 507 00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:39,000 and using other files to create awareness about this topic, 508 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:43,000 and this topic of funding is discussed in many debates, 509 00:27:43,000 --> 00:27:46,000 but it's not that there is, 510 00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:48,000 this one funding debate happening in Europe, 511 00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:50,000 at the moment, 512 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:51,000 at the moment, 513 00:27:51,000 --> 00:27:52,000 it's still a lot of peace work, 514 00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:54,000 and I do believe that this, 515 00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:57,000 that we just address these questions, 516 00:27:57,000 --> 00:28:00,000 we've already helped us to showcase, 517 00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:03,000 that there's not this one single question in this, 518 00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:04,000 niche debate, 519 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:07,000 but that there's ongoing overall funding debate, 520 00:28:07,000 --> 00:28:13,000 which is basically asking for public and private money, 521 00:28:13,000 --> 00:28:15,000 for innovation, 522 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:17,000 for core infrastructure, 523 00:28:17,000 --> 00:28:19,000 and for digital digital sovereignty, 524 00:28:19,000 --> 00:28:22,000 and to come up with one answer to this, 525 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:24,000 needs collaboration, 526 00:28:24,000 --> 00:28:26,000 it needs working together, 527 00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:30,000 and understanding in which niche's people are working on this topic, 528 00:28:30,000 --> 00:28:34,000 in order to have shared approach, 529 00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:35,000 so to say, 530 00:28:35,000 --> 00:28:36,000 to the funding question, 531 00:28:36,000 --> 00:28:38,000 and that we can also use the niche debates 532 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:40,000 to show that there are other debates 533 00:28:40,000 --> 00:28:42,000 ongoing in other files as well. 534 00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:43,000 Yeah, 535 00:28:43,000 --> 00:28:45,000 I would like to pick out the word, 536 00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:47,000 as you mentioned, 537 00:28:47,000 --> 00:28:49,000 working together, creating that book, 538 00:28:49,000 --> 00:28:52,000 and also highlight the part 539 00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:55,000 that we at FSAFE took a lot of time 540 00:28:55,000 --> 00:28:58,000 to go through all of those talks, 541 00:28:58,000 --> 00:28:59,000 to like, 542 00:28:59,000 --> 00:29:02,000 put energy in there and to create those rooms 543 00:29:02,000 --> 00:29:05,000 for the whole community to network into you, 544 00:29:05,000 --> 00:29:06,000 get together, 545 00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:09,000 but we also depend on your support. 546 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:12,000 So please consider supporting us with the nation, 547 00:29:12,000 --> 00:29:16,000 and you can find information on the FSAFE.org slash donate, 548 00:29:16,000 --> 00:29:21,000 as we can only continue our work for free software here support. 549 00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:24,000 This is something that I would like to highlight 550 00:29:24,000 --> 00:29:26,000 during the context of working, 551 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:28,000 because I was just thinking, 552 00:29:28,000 --> 00:29:30,000 during the whole time I thought, 553 00:29:30,000 --> 00:29:31,000 oh my god, 554 00:29:31,000 --> 00:29:33,000 Alex has spent a lot of time 555 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:35,000 and effort to create those rooms, 556 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:38,000 and I think this is something 557 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:41,000 that the whole community benefited by, you know? 558 00:29:41,000 --> 00:29:44,000 I hope so, I hope so, and I had a feeling. 559 00:29:44,000 --> 00:29:45,000 Yeah. 560 00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:47,000 And I also have to add, 561 00:29:47,000 --> 00:29:49,000 as the normally, 562 00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:51,000 not only the preparation of the FSAFE, 563 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:53,000 it's very time consuming, 564 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:55,000 but also the days afterwards, 565 00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:57,000 or even the weeks afterwards. 566 00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:00,000 So since you normally run into so many people during FSAFE, 567 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:03,000 and you start so many short chats 568 00:30:03,000 --> 00:30:04,000 where you agree on, 569 00:30:04,000 --> 00:30:06,000 oh we need to continue this conversation, 570 00:30:06,000 --> 00:30:07,000 but it's for them, 571 00:30:07,000 --> 00:30:09,000 you know, I have to run to the next meeting, 572 00:30:09,000 --> 00:30:11,000 and you collect even addresses, 573 00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:13,000 and a lot of things, 574 00:30:13,000 --> 00:30:15,000 and several communication networks, 575 00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:17,000 and I'm still struggling, 576 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:21,000 some may it's that I still have to send. 577 00:30:21,000 --> 00:30:24,000 So it's not only what's happening that day, 578 00:30:24,000 --> 00:30:26,000 it's one part is the preparation, 579 00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:28,000 the another part is being there for two days, 580 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:30,000 more than nine hours in those deaf rooms, 581 00:30:30,000 --> 00:30:32,000 without any sunlight. 582 00:30:32,000 --> 00:30:35,000 And then the part which comes afterwards, 583 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:37,000 and at one day, 584 00:30:37,000 --> 00:30:40,000 we will start again preparing the next FSAFE, 585 00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:43,000 so it's basically FSAFE keeps us busy for the whole year, 586 00:30:43,000 --> 00:30:45,000 one could say, 587 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:47,000 and that I can do my work, 588 00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,000 in order to realize these kind of deaf rooms, 589 00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:51,000 but in order to follow up, 590 00:30:51,000 --> 00:30:53,000 so it's not just like, 591 00:30:53,000 --> 00:30:55,000 that we do these deaf rooms for fun. 592 00:30:55,000 --> 00:30:57,000 We also want to have impact business, 593 00:30:57,000 --> 00:30:58,000 and this needs follow up, 594 00:30:58,000 --> 00:30:59,000 and this needs a lot of time. 595 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:01,000 And as said, 596 00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:02,000 for example, with the funding thing, 597 00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:04,000 we are just starting, 598 00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:05,000 to be able to do this, 599 00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:06,000 and I say, 600 00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,000 as a whole community, 601 00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:10,000 and bringing these people together, 602 00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:11,000 also takes time, 603 00:31:11,000 --> 00:31:12,000 it needs energy, 604 00:31:12,000 --> 00:31:14,000 finding common ground, 605 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:16,000 see where we can work together, 606 00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:18,000 and this needs a lot of time, 607 00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:19,000 resources, 608 00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:21,000 and if you donate to us, 609 00:31:21,000 --> 00:31:23,000 you make this work possible, 610 00:31:23,000 --> 00:31:25,000 you make our sites for funding possible, 611 00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:27,000 and then also, 612 00:31:27,000 --> 00:31:29,000 one day we'll benefit you, 613 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:30,000 if you, 614 00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:31,000 for example, 615 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:32,000 a developer, 616 00:31:32,000 --> 00:31:36,000 and maybe we'll get funds for your project in the future. 617 00:31:36,000 --> 00:31:37,000 Perfect. 618 00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:39,000 I would like to take this as a closing word, 619 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:40,000 because we, 620 00:31:40,000 --> 00:31:43,000 exceeded a bit of our time, 621 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:44,000 11, 622 00:31:44,000 --> 00:31:46,000 but I had a very fine chat with you. 623 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:47,000 Thank you so much, 624 00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:48,000 Alex, 625 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:49,000 for making this possible. 626 00:31:49,000 --> 00:31:50,000 Thank you so much for your work, 627 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:51,000 on free software, 628 00:31:51,000 --> 00:31:54,000 and advocating for free software in the European Union. 629 00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:57,000 I think this is a really valuable work, 630 00:31:57,000 --> 00:32:00,000 and I really appreciate working with you together, 631 00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:02,000 thank you. 632 00:32:02,000 --> 00:32:03,000 Thank you so much. 633 00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:05,000 This was the software freedom podcast. 634 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:07,000 If you like this episode, 635 00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:09,000 please recommend it to your friends, 636 00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:10,000 and write it. 637 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:12,000 Stay tuned for more inspiring conversations, 638 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:15,000 that explore the importance of software freedom, 639 00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:18,000 and its impact on our digital life. 640 00:32:18,000 --> 00:32:22,000 This podcast is presented to you by the free software foundation Europe. 641 00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:26,000 We are a charity that works on promoting software freedom. 642 00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:28,000 If you like our work, 643 00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:31,000 please consider supporting us as a donation. 644 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:35,000 You find more information on the FSE.org slash donate. 645 00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:37,000 Thank you so much for your support, 646 00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:39,000 and until next time, 647 00:32:39,000 --> 00:32:40,000 bye-bye.

Back to the episode SFP#31